Skip to main content
PVN470-M12TCBB vs PVN715-M12TCBB 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

PVolution PVN470-M12TCBB vs PVolution PVN715-M12TCBB

PVolution PVN470-M12TCBB
PVolution
PVN470-M12TCBB
470 Wp 23.52 % HJT Bifacial
VS
PVolution PVN715-M12TCBB
PVolution
PVN715-M12TCBB
715 Wp 23.02 % HJT Bifacial
The verdict

13 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is rated power: 245 W more power. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter PVN470-M12TCBB PVN715-M12TCBB Difference
Rated power 470 Wp 715 Wp 245 W more power
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.260 %/°C 0.030 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency 23.52 % 23.02 % 0.50 pp more efficient
Weight 23.0 kg 38.7 kg 15.7 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 36.31 V 50.59 V 14.28 V apart
Module area 1.998 m² 3.106 m² 1.108 m² apart
Weight per kWp 48.9 kg/kWp 54.1 kg/kWp 5.2 kg/kWp lighter
Power density 235.2 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² 5.0 Wp/m² higher
Short-circuit current 16.40 A 17.61 A 1.21 A apart
Voltage at max power 30.16 V 42.54 V 12.38 V apart
Cell count 96 132 36 cells apart
Current at max power 15.58 A 16.81 A 1.23 A apart
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
PVN470-M12TCBB
15,769 kWh
PVN715-M12TCBB
24,064 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,295 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario PVN470-M12TCBB PVN715-M12TCBB
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 470 W 715 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 450 W 687 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 429 W 659 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 409 W 631 W
03

Full specification

Parameter PVN470-M12TCBB PVN715-M12TCBB Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 470 Wp 715 Wp +245 W for PVN715-M12TCBB
Module efficiency 23.52 % 23.02 % +0.50 pp for PVN470-M12TCBB
Power density 235.2 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² +5.0 Wp/m² for PVN470-M12TCBB
Open-circuit voltage 36.31 V 50.59 V 14.28 V apart
Voltage at max power 30.16 V 42.54 V 12.38 V apart
Short-circuit current 16.40 A 17.61 A 1.21 A apart
Current at max power 15.58 A 16.81 A 1.23 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.260 %/°C +0.030 %/°C for PVN715-M12TCBB
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area 1.998 m² 3.106 m² 1.108 m² apart
Weight 23.0 kg 38.7 kg -15.7 kg for PVN470-M12TCBB
Weight per kWp 48.9 kg/kWp 54.1 kg/kWp -5.2 kg/kWp for PVN470-M12TCBB
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.38 %/yr Effectively the same
Technology
Cell technology HJT HJT Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 96 132 36 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#678 vs #1,797
PVN470-M12TCBB leads by 1,119 places
Power density
#674 vs #2,018
PVN470-M12TCBB leads by 1,344 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #511
PVN715-M12TCBB leads by 1,654 places
Weight
#2,611 vs #8,339
PVN470-M12TCBB leads by 5,728 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,271 vs #43
PVN715-M12TCBB leads by 3,228 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
PVolution
PVolution PVN470-M12TCBB vs PVolution PVN720-M12TCBB
13 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
PVolution
PVolution PVN470-M12TCBB vs PVolution PVN710-M12TCBB (TRION)
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
PVolution
PVolution PVN470-M12TCBB vs PVolution PVN705-M12TCBB (TRION)
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
PVolution
PVolution PVN470-M12TCBB vs PVolution PVN700-M12TCBB (TRION)
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
PVolution
PVolution PVN470-M12TCBB vs PVolution PVN465-M12TCBB
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
PVolution
PVolution PVN470-M12TCBB vs PVolution PVN460-M12TCBB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: PVolution PVN470-M12TCBB or PVolution PVN715-M12TCBB?
According to our database: PVolution PVN470-M12TCBB has higher module efficiency (23.52% vs 23.02%); PVolution PVN715-M12TCBB tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of PVolution PVN470-M12TCBB and PVolution PVN715-M12TCBB?
PVolution PVN470-M12TCBB has a module efficiency of 23.52%, while PVolution PVN715-M12TCBB is 23.02%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does PVolution PVN470-M12TCBB use vs PVolution PVN715-M12TCBB?
PVolution PVN470-M12TCBB uses HJT cells; PVolution PVN715-M12TCBB uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on PVolution PVN470-M12TCBB and PVolution PVN715-M12TCBB?
PVolution PVN470-M12TCBB has a 30 years power warranty; PVolution PVN715-M12TCBB has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are PVolution PVN470-M12TCBB and PVolution PVN715-M12TCBB bifacial panels?
Both PVolution PVN470-M12TCBB and PVolution PVN715-M12TCBB are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.