Skip to main content
565TBBG-144 vs 560TBBG-144 18 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Premier Energies PE-565TBBG-144 vs Premier Energies PE-560TBBG-144

Premier Energies
PE-565TBBG-144
565 Wp 21.86 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Premier Energies
PE-560TBBG-144
560 Wp 21.66 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

565TBBG-144 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.20 pp more efficient. 18 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See the one difference
How alike are they
18 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

1 of 19 parameters
Parameter 565TBBG-144 560TBBG-144 Difference
Module efficiency 21.86 % 21.66 % 0.20 pp more efficient
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
565TBBG-144
18,957 kWh
560TBBG-144
18,789 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 565TBBG-144 560TBBG-144
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 565 W 560 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 540 W 535 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 514 W 510 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 489 W 484 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 565TBBG-144 560TBBG-144 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 565 Wp 560 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 21.86 % 21.66 % +0.20 pp for 565TBBG-144
Power density 218.7 Wp/m² 216.8 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 51.22 V 51.18 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 43.95 V 43.91 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.50 A 13.40 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 12.86 A 12.76 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x35 mm 2278x1134x35 mm Same
Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same
Weight 34.0 kg 34.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 60.2 kg/kWp 60.7 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#6,962 vs #7,615
565TBBG-144 leads by 653 places
Power density
#6,841 vs #7,452
565TBBG-144 leads by 611 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#12,381 vs #12,519
565TBBG-144 leads by 138 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,774 vs #6,147
565TBBG-144 leads by 373 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-565TBBG-144 vs Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-565TBBG-144 vs Premier Energies PE-585TBBG-144
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-565TBBG-144 vs Premier Energies PE-580TBBG-144
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-565TBBG-144 vs Premier Energies PE-575TBBG-144
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-565TBBG-144 vs Premier Energies PE-570TBBG-144
The same specification on paper
Same manufacturer
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-565TBBG-144 vs Premier Energies PE-590 TB M10_1A
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Premier Energies PE-565TBBG-144 or Premier Energies PE-560TBBG-144?
According to our database: Premier Energies PE-565TBBG-144 has higher module efficiency (21.86% vs 21.66%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Premier Energies PE-565TBBG-144 and Premier Energies PE-560TBBG-144?
Premier Energies PE-565TBBG-144 has a module efficiency of 21.86%, while Premier Energies PE-560TBBG-144 is 21.66%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Premier Energies PE-565TBBG-144 use vs Premier Energies PE-560TBBG-144?
Premier Energies PE-565TBBG-144 uses TOPCon cells; Premier Energies PE-560TBBG-144 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Premier Energies PE-565TBBG-144 and Premier Energies PE-560TBBG-144?
Premier Energies PE-565TBBG-144 has a 30 years power warranty; Premier Energies PE-560TBBG-144 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Premier Energies PE-565TBBG-144 and Premier Energies PE-560TBBG-144 bifacial panels?
Both Premier Energies PE-565TBBG-144 and Premier Energies PE-560TBBG-144 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 1 Premier Energies offer

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.