Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-590 TB M10_1A
VS
The verdict
13 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is rated power: 35 W more power. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
6
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
13 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
132-625-THGB-G12R
590 TB M10_1A
Difference
Rated power
625 Wp
590 Wp
35 W more power
Weight
33.5 kg
28.0 kg
5.5 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
53.6 kg/kWp
47.5 kg/kWp
6.1 kg/kWp lighter
Module area
2.701 m²
2.583 m²
0.118 m² apart
Module efficiency
23.13 %
22.83 %
0.30 pp more efficient
Short-circuit current
15.64 A
14.04 A
1.60 A apart
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
0.010 %/°C better in heat
Cell technology
N-type
TOPCon
N-type vs TOPCon
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Open-circuit voltage
49.47 V
51.42 V
1.95 V apart
Current at max power
14.90 A
13.37 A
1.53 A apart
Voltage at max power
41.94 V
44.15 V
2.21 V apart
Dimensions
2382x1134x35 mm
2278x1134x35 mm
2382x1134x35 mm vs 2278x1134x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
132-625-THGB-G12R
20,970 kWh
590 TB M10_1A
19,796 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,174 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
132-625-THGB-G12R
590 TB M10_1A
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
625 W
590 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
598 W
563 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
571 W
537 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
543 W
510 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
132-625-THGB-G12R
590 TB M10_1A
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
625 Wp
590 Wp
+35 W for 132-625-THGB-G12R
Module efficiency
23.13 %
22.83 %
+0.30 pp for 132-625-THGB-G12R
Power density
231.4 Wp/m²
228.4 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
49.47 V
51.42 V
1.95 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.94 V
44.15 V
2.21 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.64 A
14.04 A
1.60 A apart
Current at max power
14.90 A
13.37 A
1.53 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
+0.010 %/°C for 132-625-THGB-G12R
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x35 mm
2278x1134x35 mm
2382x1134x35 mm vs 2278x1134x35 mm
Module area
2.701 m²
2.583 m²
0.118 m² apart
Weight
33.5 kg
28.0 kg
-5.5 kg for 590 TB M10_1A
Weight per kWp
53.6 kg/kWp
47.5 kg/kWp
-6.1 kg/kWp for 590 TB M10_1A
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
TOPCon
N-type vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,609
vs
#2,738
132-625-THGB-G12R leads by 1,129 places
Power density
#1,558
vs
#2,653
132-625-THGB-G12R leads by 1,095 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220
vs
#6,152
132-625-THGB-G12R leads by 3,932 places
Weight
#7,672
vs
#1,689
590 TB M10_1A leads by 5,983 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,276
vs
#3,701
132-625-THGB-G12R leads by 1,425 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-630-THGB-G12R
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-620-THGB-G12R
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-615-THGB-G12R
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-605-THGB-G12R
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-600-THGB-G12R
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R or Premier Energies PE-590 TB M10_1A?
According to our database: Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R has higher module efficiency (23.13% vs 22.83%); Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R and Premier Energies PE-590 TB M10_1A?
Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R has a module efficiency of 23.13%, while Premier Energies PE-590 TB M10_1A is 22.83%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R use vs Premier Energies PE-590 TB M10_1A?
Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R uses N-type cells; Premier Energies PE-590 TB M10_1A uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R and Premier Energies PE-590 TB M10_1A?
Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R has a 30 years power warranty; Premier Energies PE-590 TB M10_1A has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R and Premier Energies PE-590 TB M10_1A bifacial panels?
Both Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R and Premier Energies PE-590 TB M10_1A are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
