Skip to main content
625-THGB-G12R vs 610-THGB-G12R 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R

Premier Energies
PE-132-625-THGB-G12R
625 Wp 23.13 % N-type Bifacial
VS
Premier Energies
PE-132-610-THGB-G12R
610 Wp 22.58 % N-type Bifacial
The verdict

625-THGB-G12R leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.55 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter 625-THGB-G12R 610-THGB-G12R Difference
Module efficiency 23.13 % 22.58 % 0.55 pp more efficient
Power density 231.4 Wp/m² 225.8 Wp/m² 5.6 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 625 Wp 610 Wp 15 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
625-THGB-G12R
20,970 kWh
610-THGB-G12R
20,467 kWh
Lifetime gap
503 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 625-THGB-G12R 610-THGB-G12R
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 625 W 610 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 598 W 583 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 571 W 557 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 543 W 530 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 625-THGB-G12R 610-THGB-G12R Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 625 Wp 610 Wp +15 W for 625-THGB-G12R
Module efficiency 23.13 % 22.58 % +0.55 pp for 625-THGB-G12R
Power density 231.4 Wp/m² 225.8 Wp/m² +5.6 Wp/m² for 625-THGB-G12R
Open-circuit voltage 49.47 V 49.06 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.94 V 41.39 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 15.64 A 15.62 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 14.90 A 14.74 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x35 mm 2382x1134x35 mm Same
Module area 2.701 m² 2.701 m² Same
Weight 33.5 kg 33.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 53.6 kg/kWp 54.9 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type N-type Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#1,609 vs #3,887
625-THGB-G12R leads by 2,278 places
Power density
#1,558 vs #3,788
625-THGB-G12R leads by 2,230 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,672 vs #9,375
625-THGB-G12R leads by 1,703 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,276 vs #3,381
625-THGB-G12R leads by 1,105 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-630-THGB-G12R
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-620-THGB-G12R
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-615-THGB-G12R
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-605-THGB-G12R
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-132-600-THGB-G12R
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R vs Premier Energies PE-590 TB M10_1A
13 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R or Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R?
According to our database: Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R has higher module efficiency (23.13% vs 22.58%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R and Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R?
Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R has a module efficiency of 23.13%, while Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R is 22.58%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R use vs Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R?
Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R uses N-type cells; Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R and Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R?
Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R has a 30 years power warranty; Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R and Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R bifacial panels?
Both Premier Energies PE-132-625-THGB-G12R and Premier Energies PE-132-610-THGB-G12R are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.