Skip to main content
PS710M13GFH-22/WNH vs PS695M13GFH-22/WNH 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH

Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH
PS710M13GFH-22/WNH
710 Wp 22.86 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH
PS695M13GFH-22/WNH
695 Wp 22.37 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

PS710M13GFH-22/WNH leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.49 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter PS710M13GFH-22/WNH PS695M13GFH-22/WNH Difference
Module efficiency 22.86 % 22.37 % 0.49 pp more efficient
Power density 228.6 Wp/m² 223.7 Wp/m² 4.8 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 710 Wp 695 Wp 15 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
PS710M13GFH-22/WNH
23,822 kWh
PS695M13GFH-22/WNH
23,319 kWh
Lifetime gap
503 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario PS710M13GFH-22/WNH PS695M13GFH-22/WNH
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 710 W 695 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 679 W 665 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 648 W 635 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 617 W 604 W
03

Full specification

Parameter PS710M13GFH-22/WNH PS695M13GFH-22/WNH Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 710 Wp 695 Wp +15 W for PS710M13GFH-22/WNH
Module efficiency 22.86 % 22.37 % +0.49 pp for PS710M13GFH-22/WNH
Power density 228.6 Wp/m² 223.7 Wp/m² +4.8 Wp/m² for PS710M13GFH-22/WNH
Open-circuit voltage 48.82 V 48.22 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 40.76 V 40.20 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.50 A 18.32 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.45 A 17.30 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x33 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 37.7 kg 37.7 kg Same
Weight per kWp 53.1 kg/kWp 54.2 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#2,591 vs #5,032
PS710M13GFH-22/WNH leads by 2,441 places
Power density
#2,529 vs #4,939
PS710M13GFH-22/WNH leads by 2,410 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#6,938 vs #8,573
PS710M13GFH-22/WNH leads by 1,635 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#618 vs #1,124
PS710M13GFH-22/WNH leads by 506 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS705M13GFH-22/WNH
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS690M13GFH-22/WNH
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW
7 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same manufacturer
Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar NS-730MH-132
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
7 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH or Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH?
According to our database: Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH has higher module efficiency (22.86% vs 22.37%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH and Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH?
Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH has a module efficiency of 22.86%, while Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH is 22.37%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH use vs Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH?
Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH uses TOPCon cells; Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH and Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH?
Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH has a 30 years power warranty; Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH and Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH bifacial panels?
Both Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH and Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 Phono Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.