Skip to main content
PS710M13GFH-22/WNH vs NS-730MH-132 7 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar NS-730MH-132

Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH
PS710M13GFH-22/WNH
710 Wp 22.86 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
NS-730MH-132
730 Wp 23.50 % N-type Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

NS-730MH-132 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.64 pp more efficient. 7 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 11 differences
How alike are they
7 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

11 of 18 parameters
Parameter PS710M13GFH-22/WNH NS-730MH-132 Difference
Module efficiency 22.86 % 23.50 % 0.64 pp more efficient
Performance warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs 5 yrs longer
Weight 37.7 kg 34.0 kg 3.7 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 53.1 kg/kWp 46.6 kg/kWp 6.5 kg/kWp lighter
Power density 228.6 Wp/m² 235.0 Wp/m² 6.4 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 710 Wp 730 Wp 20 W more power
Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Open-circuit voltage 48.82 V 50.16 V 1.34 V apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x30 mm
Voltage at max power 40.76 V 42.19 V 1.43 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
PS710M13GFH-22/WNH
23,822 kWh
NS-730MH-132
24,493 kWh
Lifetime gap
671 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario PS710M13GFH-22/WNH NS-730MH-132
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 710 W 730 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 679 W 698 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 648 W 666 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 617 W 635 W
03

Full specification

Parameter PS710M13GFH-22/WNH NS-730MH-132 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 710 Wp 730 Wp +20 W for NS-730MH-132
Module efficiency 22.86 % 23.50 % +0.64 pp for NS-730MH-132
Power density 228.6 Wp/m² 235.0 Wp/m² +6.4 Wp/m² for NS-730MH-132
Open-circuit voltage 48.82 V 50.16 V 1.34 V apart
Voltage at max power 40.76 V 42.19 V 1.43 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.50 A 18.19 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.45 A 17.31 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 37.7 kg 34.0 kg -3.7 kg for NS-730MH-132
Weight per kWp 53.1 kg/kWp 46.6 kg/kWp -6.5 kg/kWp for NS-730MH-132
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs +5 yrs for PS710M13GFH-22/WNH
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr - Not published by Phono Solar
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#2,591 vs #749
NS-730MH-132 leads by 1,842 places
Power density
#2,529 vs #836
NS-730MH-132 leads by 1,693 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#6,938 vs #1,233
NS-730MH-132 leads by 5,705 places
Warranty
#21 vs #9,912
PS710M13GFH-22/WNH leads by 9,891 places
Overall
#618 vs #397
NS-730MH-132 leads by 221 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS705M13GFH-22/WNH
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS690M13GFH-22/WNH
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-720MH-132
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-710MH-132
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH or Phono Solar NS-730MH-132?
According to our database: Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 22.86%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH and Phono Solar NS-730MH-132?
Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH has a module efficiency of 22.86%, while Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH use vs Phono Solar NS-730MH-132?
Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH uses TOPCon cells; Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH and Phono Solar NS-730MH-132?
Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH has a 30 years power warranty; Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH and Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 bifacial panels?
Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 4 Phono Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.