Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH
VS
The verdict
PS625L8GF-22/WNH leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 75 W more power. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
10 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
PS625L8GF-22/WNH
PS700M13GFH-22/WNH
Difference
Rated power
625 Wp
700 Wp
75 W more power
Module efficiency
23.14 %
22.53 %
0.61 pp more efficient
Weight
32.6 kg
37.7 kg
5.1 kg lighter
Power density
231.4 Wp/m²
225.3 Wp/m²
6.0 Wp/m² higher
Short-circuit current
15.60 A
18.38 A
2.78 A apart
Module area
2.701 m²
3.106 m²
0.405 m² apart
Current at max power
14.93 A
17.35 A
2.42 A apart
Open-circuit voltage
49.77 V
48.42 V
1.35 V apart
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Voltage at max power
41.87 V
40.39 V
1.48 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
PS625L8GF-22/WNH
20,970 kWh
PS700M13GFH-22/WNH
23,486 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,516 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
PS625L8GF-22/WNH
PS700M13GFH-22/WNH
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
625 W
700 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
598 W
670 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
571 W
639 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
543 W
609 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
PS625L8GF-22/WNH
PS700M13GFH-22/WNH
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
625 Wp
700 Wp
+75 W for PS700M13GFH-22/WNH
Module efficiency
23.14 %
22.53 %
+0.61 pp for PS625L8GF-22/WNH
Power density
231.4 Wp/m²
225.3 Wp/m²
+6.0 Wp/m² for PS625L8GF-22/WNH
Open-circuit voltage
49.77 V
48.42 V
1.35 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.87 V
40.39 V
1.48 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.60 A
18.38 A
2.78 A apart
Current at max power
14.93 A
17.35 A
2.42 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
2.701 m²
3.106 m²
0.405 m² apart
Weight
32.6 kg
37.7 kg
-5.1 kg for PS625L8GF-22/WNH
Weight per kWp
52.2 kg/kWp
53.9 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,554
vs
#4,041
PS625L8GF-22/WNH leads by 2,487 places
Power density
#1,558
vs
#4,048
PS625L8GF-22/WNH leads by 2,490 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220
vs
#2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,666
vs
#8,080
PS625L8GF-22/WNH leads by 2,414 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,853
vs
#937
PS700M13GFH-22/WNH leads by 916 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS705M13GFH-22/WNH
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS690M13GFH-22/WNH
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS630L8GF-22/WNH
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS630L8GFH-22/WNH
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH or Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH?
According to our database: Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH has higher module efficiency (23.14% vs 22.53%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH and Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH?
Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH has a module efficiency of 23.14%, while Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH is 22.53%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH use vs Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH?
Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH uses TOPCon cells; Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH and Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH?
Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH has a 30 years power warranty; Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH and Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH bifacial panels?
Both Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH and Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 5 Phono Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.