Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH
VS
The verdict
PS625L8GF-22/WNH leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.77 pp more efficient. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 11 differencesHow alike are they
8
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
11 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
PS625L8GF-22/WNH
PS695M13GFH-22/WNH
Difference
Module efficiency
23.14 %
22.37 %
0.77 pp more efficient
Rated power
625 Wp
695 Wp
70 W more power
Weight
32.6 kg
37.7 kg
5.1 kg lighter
Power density
231.4 Wp/m²
223.7 Wp/m²
7.6 Wp/m² higher
Short-circuit current
15.60 A
18.32 A
2.72 A apart
Module area
2.701 m²
3.106 m²
0.405 m² apart
Current at max power
14.93 A
17.30 A
2.37 A apart
Weight per kWp
52.2 kg/kWp
54.2 kg/kWp
2.1 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage
49.77 V
48.22 V
1.55 V apart
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Voltage at max power
41.87 V
40.20 V
1.67 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
PS625L8GF-22/WNH
20,970 kWh
PS695M13GFH-22/WNH
23,319 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,349 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
PS625L8GF-22/WNH
PS695M13GFH-22/WNH
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
625 W
695 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
598 W
665 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
571 W
635 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
543 W
604 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
PS625L8GF-22/WNH
PS695M13GFH-22/WNH
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
625 Wp
695 Wp
+70 W for PS695M13GFH-22/WNH
Module efficiency
23.14 %
22.37 %
+0.77 pp for PS625L8GF-22/WNH
Power density
231.4 Wp/m²
223.7 Wp/m²
+7.6 Wp/m² for PS625L8GF-22/WNH
Open-circuit voltage
49.77 V
48.22 V
1.55 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.87 V
40.20 V
1.67 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.60 A
18.32 A
2.72 A apart
Current at max power
14.93 A
17.30 A
2.37 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
2.701 m²
3.106 m²
0.405 m² apart
Weight
32.6 kg
37.7 kg
-5.1 kg for PS625L8GF-22/WNH
Weight per kWp
52.2 kg/kWp
54.2 kg/kWp
-2.1 kg/kWp for PS625L8GF-22/WNH
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,554
vs
#5,032
PS625L8GF-22/WNH leads by 3,478 places
Power density
#1,558
vs
#4,939
PS625L8GF-22/WNH leads by 3,381 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220
vs
#2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,666
vs
#8,573
PS625L8GF-22/WNH leads by 2,907 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,853
vs
#1,124
PS695M13GFH-22/WNH leads by 729 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS705M13GFH-22/WNH
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS700M13GFH-22/WNH
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS690M13GFH-22/WNH
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS630L8GF-22/WNH
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS630L8GFH-22/WNH
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH or Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH?
According to our database: Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH has higher module efficiency (23.14% vs 22.37%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH and Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH?
Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH has a module efficiency of 23.14%, while Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH is 22.37%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH use vs Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH?
Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH uses TOPCon cells; Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH and Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH?
Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH has a 30 years power warranty; Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH and Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH bifacial panels?
Both Phono Solar PS625L8GF-22/WNH and Phono Solar PS695M13GFH-22/WNH are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 5 Phono Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.