Phono Solar PS475L7GFH-18/VBH vs Phono Solar NS-720MH-132
VS
The verdict
PS475L7GFH-18/VBH leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 245 W more power. 3 of 17 comparable parameters are identical, with 2 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
3
of 17 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
14 of 17 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
PS475L7GFH-18/VBH
NS-720MH-132
Difference
Rated power
475 Wp
720 Wp
245 W more power
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
5 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Weight
23.5 kg
34.0 kg
10.5 kg lighter
Product warranty
30 yrs
15 yrs
15 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
40.11 V
50.00 V
9.89 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.01 A
18.00 A
2.99 A apart
Module area
2.041 m²
3.106 m²
1.065 m² apart
Cell technology
Back Contact
N-type
Back Contact vs N-type
Voltage at max power
33.20 V
41.89 V
8.69 V apart
Current at max power
14.31 A
17.19 A
2.88 A apart
Weight per kWp
49.5 kg/kWp
47.2 kg/kWp
2.3 kg/kWp lighter
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Dimensions
1800x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x30 mm
1800x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
PS475L7GFH-18/VBH
15,937 kWh
NS-720MH-132
24,157 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,220 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
PS475L7GFH-18/VBH
NS-720MH-132
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
475 W
720 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
456 W
689 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
438 W
657 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
419 W
626 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
PS475L7GFH-18/VBH
NS-720MH-132
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
475 Wp
720 Wp
+245 W for NS-720MH-132
Module efficiency
23.27 %
23.17 %
Effectively the same
Power density
232.7 Wp/m²
231.8 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
40.11 V
50.00 V
9.89 V apart
Voltage at max power
33.20 V
41.89 V
8.69 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.01 A
18.00 A
2.99 A apart
Current at max power
14.31 A
17.19 A
2.88 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for PS475L7GFH-18/VBH
Mechanical
Dimensions
1800x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x30 mm
1800x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x30 mm
Module area
2.041 m²
3.106 m²
1.065 m² apart
Weight
23.5 kg
34.0 kg
-10.5 kg for PS475L7GFH-18/VBH
Weight per kWp
49.5 kg/kWp
47.2 kg/kWp
-2.3 kg/kWp for NS-720MH-132
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
15 yrs
+15 yrs for PS475L7GFH-18/VBH
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
+5 yrs for PS475L7GFH-18/VBH
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
-
Not published by Phono Solar
Technology
Cell technology
Back Contact
N-type
Back Contact vs N-type
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
-
132
Not published by Phono Solar
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,013 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,199
vs
#1,469
PS475L7GFH-18/VBH leads by 270 places
Power density
#1,185
vs
#1,343
PS475L7GFH-18/VBH leads by 158 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#2,165
PS475L7GFH-18/VBH leads by 1,654 places
Weight
#2,997
vs
#1,581
NS-720MH-132 leads by 1,416 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#9,777
PS475L7GFH-18/VBH leads by 9,756 places
Overall
#3,418
vs
#676
NS-720MH-132 leads by 2,742 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-730MH-132
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-710MH-132
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-700MH-132
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-690MH-132
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-670MH-132
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-665MH-132
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Phono Solar PS475L7GFH-18/VBH or Phono Solar NS-720MH-132?
According to our database: Phono Solar PS475L7GFH-18/VBH has higher module efficiency (23.27% vs 23.17%); Phono Solar PS475L7GFH-18/VBH tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Phono Solar PS475L7GFH-18/VBH and Phono Solar NS-720MH-132?
Phono Solar PS475L7GFH-18/VBH has a module efficiency of 23.27%, while Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 is 23.17%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Phono Solar PS475L7GFH-18/VBH use vs Phono Solar NS-720MH-132?
Phono Solar PS475L7GFH-18/VBH uses Back Contact cells; Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Phono Solar PS475L7GFH-18/VBH and Phono Solar NS-720MH-132?
Phono Solar PS475L7GFH-18/VBH has a 30 years power warranty; Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Phono Solar PS475L7GFH-18/VBH and Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 bifacial panels?
Phono Solar PS475L7GFH-18/VBH is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Phono Solar NS-720MH-132 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 6 Phono Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.