Peimar SG325P vs Peimar OR10H595MNDB
VS
The verdict
OR10H595MNDB leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 6.29 pp more efficient. 1 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 17 differencesHow alike are they
1
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
17 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
SG325P
OR10H595MNDB
Difference
Module efficiency
16.74 %
23.03 %
6.29 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.430 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.140 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
325 Wp
595 Wp
270 W more power
Power density
167.4 Wp/m²
230.3 Wp/m²
62.9 Wp/m² higher
Weight
22.5 kg
30.0 kg
7.5 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
69.2 kg/kWp
50.4 kg/kWp
18.8 kg/kWp lighter
Product warranty
20 yrs
25 yrs
5 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
44.60 V
53.12 V
8.52 V apart
Short-circuit current
9.74 A
14.13 A
4.39 A apart
Module area
1.941 m²
2.583 m²
0.642 m² apart
Cell technology
PERC
TOPCon
PERC vs TOPCon
Voltage at max power
36.30 V
44.48 V
8.18 V apart
Current at max power
9.03 A
13.38 A
4.35 A apart
Cell count
72
144
72 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
1957x992x40 mm
2278x1134x30 mm
1957x992x40 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
Cell type
Polycrystalline
Monocrystalline
Polycrystalline vs Monocrystalline
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
SG325P
10,904 kWh
OR10H595MNDB
19,963 kWh
Lifetime gap
9,059 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
SG325P
OR10H595MNDB
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
325 W
595 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
93.5% of rated power
304 W
569 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
87.1% of rated power
283 W
543 W
Hot roof
70 °C
80.7% of rated power
262 W
517 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
SG325P
OR10H595MNDB
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
325 Wp
595 Wp
+270 W for OR10H595MNDB
Module efficiency
16.74 %
23.03 %
+6.29 pp for OR10H595MNDB
Power density
167.4 Wp/m²
230.3 Wp/m²
+62.9 Wp/m² for OR10H595MNDB
Open-circuit voltage
44.60 V
53.12 V
8.52 V apart
Voltage at max power
36.30 V
44.48 V
8.18 V apart
Short-circuit current
9.74 A
14.13 A
4.39 A apart
Current at max power
9.03 A
13.38 A
4.35 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.430 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.140 %/°C for OR10H595MNDB
Mechanical
Dimensions
1957x992x40 mm
2278x1134x30 mm
1957x992x40 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
Module area
1.941 m²
2.583 m²
0.642 m² apart
Weight
22.5 kg
30.0 kg
-7.5 kg for SG325P
Weight per kWp
69.2 kg/kWp
50.4 kg/kWp
-18.8 kg/kWp for OR10H595MNDB
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
20 yrs
25 yrs
+5 yrs for OR10H595MNDB
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
TOPCon
PERC vs TOPCon
Cell type
Polycrystalline
Monocrystalline
Polycrystalline vs Monocrystalline
Cell count
72
144
72 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#13,521
vs
#1,744
OR10H595MNDB leads by 11,777 places
Power density
#13,515
vs
#1,758
OR10H595MNDB leads by 11,757 places
Heat behaviour
#13,847
vs
#2,165
OR10H595MNDB leads by 11,682 places
Weight
#13,370
vs
#3,800
OR10H595MNDB leads by 9,570 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#13,109
vs
#1,378
OR10H595MNDB leads by 11,731 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Peimar
Peimar SG325P vs Peimar SG330P
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Peimar
Peimar OR10H595MNDB vs Peimar OR10H450MNDB (FB)
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same manufacturer
Peimar
Peimar SG325P vs Peimar SA500M (FB)
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Peimar SG325P or Peimar OR10H595MNDB?
According to our database: Peimar OR10H595MNDB has higher module efficiency (23.03% vs 16.74%); Peimar OR10H595MNDB tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.430%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Peimar SG325P and Peimar OR10H595MNDB?
Peimar SG325P has a module efficiency of 16.74%, while Peimar OR10H595MNDB is 23.03%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Peimar SG325P use vs Peimar OR10H595MNDB?
Peimar SG325P uses PERC cells; Peimar OR10H595MNDB uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Peimar SG325P and Peimar OR10H595MNDB?
Peimar SG325P has a 30 years power warranty; Peimar OR10H595MNDB has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Peimar SG325P and Peimar OR10H595MNDB bifacial panels?
Peimar OR10H595MNDB is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Peimar SG325P is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 13 Peimar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.