Mysolar USA MS695N-DHBG vs Mysolar USA MS715N-HJTGB
VS
The verdict
MS715N-HJTGB leads on the differences that matter
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.040 %/°C better in heat. 9 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 9 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
9 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
MS695N-DHBG
MS715N-HJTGB
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.040 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency
22.37 %
23.01 %
0.64 pp more efficient
Product warranty
25 yrs
30 yrs
5 yrs longer
Power density
223.7 Wp/m²
230.2 Wp/m²
6.4 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
695 Wp
715 Wp
20 W more power
Cell technology
TOPCon
HJT
TOPCon vs HJT
Open-circuit voltage
48.62 V
50.60 V
1.98 V apart
Voltage at max power
40.52 V
42.55 V
2.03 V apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
MS695N-DHBG
23,319 kWh
MS715N-HJTGB
23,990 kWh
Lifetime gap
671 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
MS695N-DHBG
MS715N-HJTGB
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
695 W
715 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
664 W
687 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
632 W
659 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
601 W
631 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
MS695N-DHBG
MS715N-HJTGB
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
695 Wp
715 Wp
+20 W for MS715N-HJTGB
Module efficiency
22.37 %
23.01 %
+0.64 pp for MS715N-HJTGB
Power density
223.7 Wp/m²
230.2 Wp/m²
+6.4 Wp/m² for MS715N-HJTGB
Open-circuit voltage
48.62 V
50.60 V
1.98 V apart
Voltage at max power
40.52 V
42.55 V
2.03 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.93 A
17.61 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
17.17 A
16.81 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.040 %/°C for MS715N-HJTGB
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
38.5 kg
38.8 kg
Effectively the same
Weight per kWp
55.4 kg/kWp
54.3 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
30 yrs
+5 yrs for MS715N-HJTGB
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
0.25 %/yr
Not published by Mysolar USA
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
HJT
TOPCon vs HJT
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#4,970
vs
#1,911
MS715N-HJTGB leads by 3,059 places
Power density
#4,877
vs
#2,018
MS715N-HJTGB leads by 2,859 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093
vs
#511
MS715N-HJTGB leads by 5,582 places
Weight
#9,818
vs
#8,518
MS715N-HJTGB leads by 1,300 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#290
vs
#43
MS715N-HJTGB leads by 247 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS695N-DHBG vs Mysolar USA MS700N-DHBG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS695N-DHBG vs Mysolar USA MS690N-DHBG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS695N-DHBG vs Mysolar USA MS685N-DHBG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS695N-DHBG vs Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS715N-HJTGB vs Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS715N-HJTGB vs Mysolar USA MS710N-HJTGB
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Mysolar USA MS695N-DHBG or Mysolar USA MS715N-HJTGB?
According to our database: Mysolar USA MS715N-HJTGB has higher module efficiency (23.01% vs 22.37%); Mysolar USA MS715N-HJTGB tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Mysolar USA MS695N-DHBG and Mysolar USA MS715N-HJTGB?
Mysolar USA MS695N-DHBG has a module efficiency of 22.37%, while Mysolar USA MS715N-HJTGB is 23.01%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Mysolar USA MS695N-DHBG use vs Mysolar USA MS715N-HJTGB?
Mysolar USA MS695N-DHBG uses TOPCon cells; Mysolar USA MS715N-HJTGB uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Mysolar USA MS695N-DHBG and Mysolar USA MS715N-HJTGB?
Mysolar USA MS695N-DHBG has a 30 years power warranty; Mysolar USA MS715N-HJTGB has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Mysolar USA MS695N-DHBG and Mysolar USA MS715N-HJTGB bifacial panels?
Both Mysolar USA MS695N-DHBG and Mysolar USA MS715N-HJTGB are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.