Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G vs Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G
VS
The verdict
MST12R615HN3G leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 20 W more power. 9 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 9 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
9 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
MST12R615HN3G
MSH10-595HN4G
Difference
Rated power
615 Wp
595 Wp
20 W more power
Module area
2.701 m²
2.583 m²
0.118 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage
48.29 V
51.85 V
3.56 V apart
Short-circuit current
16.20 A
14.62 A
1.58 A apart
Module efficiency
22.80 %
23.00 %
0.20 pp more efficient
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Voltage at max power
39.97 V
43.55 V
3.58 V apart
Current at max power
15.39 A
13.67 A
1.72 A apart
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x35 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2278x1134x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
MST12R615HN3G
20,634 kWh
MSH10-595HN4G
19,963 kWh
Lifetime gap
671 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
MST12R615HN3G
MSH10-595HN4G
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
615 W
595 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
588 W
569 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
561 W
543 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
535 W
517 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
MST12R615HN3G
MSH10-595HN4G
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
615 Wp
595 Wp
+20 W for MST12R615HN3G
Module efficiency
22.80 %
23.00 %
+0.20 pp for MSH10-595HN4G
Power density
227.7 Wp/m²
230.3 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
48.29 V
51.85 V
3.56 V apart
Voltage at max power
39.97 V
43.55 V
3.58 V apart
Short-circuit current
16.20 A
14.62 A
1.58 A apart
Current at max power
15.39 A
13.67 A
1.72 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x35 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2278x1134x35 mm
Module area
2.701 m²
2.583 m²
0.118 m² apart
Weight
33.0 kg
32.5 kg
Effectively the same
Weight per kWp
53.7 kg/kWp
54.6 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
-
15 yrs
Not published by Mission Solar
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
N-type
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#2,769
vs
#1,970
MSH10-595HN4G leads by 799 places
Power density
#3,132
vs
#1,809
MSH10-595HN4G leads by 1,323 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220
vs
#2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,730
vs
#9,059
MST12R615HN3G leads by 1,329 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,428
vs
#2,813
MSH10-595HN4G leads by 2,615 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G vs Mission Solar MST12R620HN3G
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G vs Mission Solar MST12R610HN3G
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G vs Mission Solar MSH10-590HN4G
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G vs Mission Solar MSH10-585HN4G
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G vs Mission Solar MST12670HP3G
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G vs Mission Solar MST12665HP3G
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G or Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G?
According to our database: Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 22.80%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G and Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G?
Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G has a module efficiency of 22.80%, while Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G is 23.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G use vs Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G?
Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G uses N-type cells; Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G and Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G?
Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G has a 30 years power warranty; Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G and Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G bifacial panels?
Both Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G and Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 4 Mission Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.