Skip to main content
595HN4G vs 585HN4G 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G vs Mission Solar MSH10-585HN4G

Mission Solar
MSH10-595HN4G
595 Wp 23.00 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Mission Solar
MSH10-585HN4G
585 Wp 22.60 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

595HN4G leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.40 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter 595HN4G 585HN4G Difference
Module efficiency 23.00 % 22.60 % 0.40 pp more efficient
Power density 230.3 Wp/m² 226.5 Wp/m² 3.9 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 595 Wp 585 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
595HN4G
19,963 kWh
585HN4G
19,628 kWh
Lifetime gap
335 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 595HN4G 585HN4G
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 595 W 585 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 569 W 560 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 543 W 534 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 517 W 509 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 595HN4G 585HN4G Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 595 Wp 585 Wp +10 W for 595HN4G
Module efficiency 23.00 % 22.60 % +0.40 pp for 595HN4G
Power density 230.3 Wp/m² 226.5 Wp/m² +3.9 Wp/m² for 595HN4G
Open-circuit voltage 51.85 V 51.50 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 43.55 V 43.30 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.62 A 14.47 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.67 A 13.53 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x35 mm 2278x1134x35 mm Same
Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same
Weight 32.5 kg 32.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 54.6 kg/kWp 55.6 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type N-type Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#1,970 vs #3,716
595HN4G leads by 1,746 places
Power density
#1,809 vs #3,557
595HN4G leads by 1,748 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,059 vs #9,992
595HN4G leads by 933 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,813 vs #3,641
595HN4G leads by 828 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G vs Mission Solar MSH10-590HN4G
One difference: module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G vs Mission Solar MST12670HP3G
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G vs Mission Solar MST12665HP3G
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G vs Mission Solar MST12660HP3G
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G vs Mission Solar MST12R620HN3G
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G vs Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G
9 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G or Mission Solar MSH10-585HN4G?
According to our database: Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 22.60%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G and Mission Solar MSH10-585HN4G?
Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while Mission Solar MSH10-585HN4G is 22.60%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G use vs Mission Solar MSH10-585HN4G?
Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G uses N-type cells; Mission Solar MSH10-585HN4G uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G and Mission Solar MSH10-585HN4G?
Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G has a 30 years power warranty; Mission Solar MSH10-585HN4G has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G and Mission Solar MSH10-585HN4G bifacial panels?
Both Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G and Mission Solar MSH10-585HN4G are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 Mission Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.