MST12660HP3G vs MSE410HT0B 4 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Mission Solar MST12660HP3G vs Mission Solar MSE410HT0B

Q: Which panel is better: Mission Solar MST12660HP3G or Mission Solar MSE410HT0B?

According to our database: Mission Solar MST12660HP3G has higher module efficiency (21.20% vs 21.00%); Mission Solar MST12660HP3G tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.340%/°C vs -0.343%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

Q: What is the efficiency of Mission Solar MST12660HP3G and Mission Solar MSE410HT0B?

Mission Solar MST12660HP3G has a module efficiency of 21.20%, while Mission Solar MSE410HT0B is 21.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

Q: What cell technology does Mission Solar MST12660HP3G use vs Mission Solar MSE410HT0B?

Mission Solar MST12660HP3G uses PERC cells; Mission Solar MSE410HT0B uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

Q: What is the warranty on Mission Solar MST12660HP3G and Mission Solar MSE410HT0B?

Mission Solar MST12660HP3G has a 30 years power warranty; Mission Solar MSE410HT0B has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Q: Are Mission Solar MST12660HP3G and Mission Solar MSE410HT0B bifacial panels?

Mission Solar MST12660HP3G is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Mission Solar MSE410HT0B is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Mission Solar

MST12660HP3G

660 Wp 21.20 % PERC Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

Mission Solar

MSE410HT0B

410 Wp 21.00 % PERC

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

The verdict

MST12660HP3G leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 250 W more power. 4 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 14 differences

How alike are they

4 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical

identical differs not published

What actually differs

14 of 18 parameters

Parameter MST12660HP3G MSE410HT0B Difference

Rated power 660 Wp 410 Wp 250 W more power

Performance warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs 5 yrs longer

Weight 38.7 kg 19.0 kg 19.7 kg lighter

Weight per kWp 58.6 kg/kWp 46.3 kg/kWp 12.3 kg/kWp lighter

Annual degradation 0.45 %/yr 0.55 %/yr 0.10 %/yr slower

Open-circuit voltage 45.90 V 37.41 V 8.49 V apart

Short-circuit current 18.45 A 13.90 A 4.55 A apart

Module area 3.106 m² 1.956 m² 1.151 m² apart

Module efficiency 21.20 % 21.00 % 0.20 pp more efficient

Voltage at max power 38.10 V 31.38 V 6.72 V apart

Current at max power 17.35 A 13.07 A 4.28 A apart

Cell count 132 108 24 cells apart

Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No

Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 1723x1135x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 1723x1135x35 mm

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Cell temperature

MST12660HP3G

21,734 kWh

MSE410HT0B

13,288 kWh

Lifetime gap

8,446 kWh

Output when it is hot

Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees

Scenario MST12660HP3G MSE410HT0B

Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 660 W 410 W

Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 626 W 389 W

Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.7% of rated power 593 W 368 W

Hot roof 70 °C 84.6% of rated power 559 W 347 W

Full specification

Parameter MST12660HP3G MSE410HT0B Difference

Power and efficiency

Rated power 660 Wp 410 Wp +250 W for MST12660HP3G

Module efficiency 21.20 % 21.00 % +0.20 pp for MST12660HP3G

Power density 212.5 Wp/m² 209.7 Wp/m² Effectively the same

Open-circuit voltage 45.90 V 37.41 V 8.49 V apart

Voltage at max power 38.10 V 31.38 V 6.72 V apart

Short-circuit current 18.45 A 13.90 A 4.55 A apart

Current at max power 17.35 A 13.07 A 4.28 A apart

Temperature

Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.343 %/°C Effectively the same

Mechanical

Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 1723x1135x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 1723x1135x35 mm

Module area 3.106 m² 1.956 m² 1.151 m² apart

Weight 38.7 kg 19.0 kg -19.7 kg for MSE410HT0B

Weight per kWp 58.6 kg/kWp 46.3 kg/kWp -12.3 kg/kWp for MSE410HT0B

Warranty and degradation

Product warranty - 25 yrs Not published by Mission Solar

Performance warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs +5 yrs for MST12660HP3G

Annual degradation 0.45 %/yr 0.55 %/yr -0.10 %/yr for MST12660HP3G

Technology

Cell technology PERC PERC Same

Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same

Cell count 132 108 24 cells apart

Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No

Against the whole database

14,129 panels

Efficiency

#9,145 vs #9,828

MST12660HP3G leads by 683 places

Power density

#9,028 vs #9,994

MST12660HP3G leads by 966 places

Heat behaviour

#8,846 vs #10,418

MST12660HP3G leads by 1,572 places

Weight

#11,906 vs #1,120

MSE410HT0B leads by 10,786 places

Warranty

#21 vs #9,912

MST12660HP3G leads by 9,891 places

Overall

#5,713 vs #10,147

MST12660HP3G leads by 4,434 places

More useful comparisons

Open the full database

Same series, other bin

Mission Solar

Mission Solar MST12660HP3G vs Mission Solar MST12670HP3G

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Mission Solar

Mission Solar MST12660HP3G vs Mission Solar MST12665HP3G

One difference: module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Mission Solar

Mission Solar MSE410HT0B vs Mission Solar MSE405HT0B

One difference: module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Mission Solar

Mission Solar MSE410HT0B vs Mission Solar MSE400HT0B

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same manufacturer

Mission Solar

Mission Solar MST12660HP3G vs Mission Solar MST12R620HN3G

14 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same manufacturer

Mission Solar

Mission Solar MST12660HP3G vs Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G

14 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Written summary

Checking cache...

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Mission Solar MST12660HP3G or Mission Solar MSE410HT0B?

According to our database: Mission Solar MST12660HP3G has higher module efficiency (21.20% vs 21.00%); Mission Solar MST12660HP3G tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.340%/°C vs -0.343%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

What is the efficiency of Mission Solar MST12660HP3G and Mission Solar MSE410HT0B?

Mission Solar MST12660HP3G has a module efficiency of 21.20%, while Mission Solar MSE410HT0B is 21.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

What cell technology does Mission Solar MST12660HP3G use vs Mission Solar MSE410HT0B?

Mission Solar MST12660HP3G uses PERC cells; Mission Solar MSE410HT0B uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

What is the warranty on Mission Solar MST12660HP3G and Mission Solar MSE410HT0B?

Mission Solar MST12660HP3G has a 30 years power warranty; Mission Solar MSE410HT0B has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Are Mission Solar MST12660HP3G and Mission Solar MSE410HT0B bifacial panels?

Mission Solar MST12660HP3G is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Mission Solar MSE410HT0B is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 4 Mission Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.