Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG vs IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH
VS
The verdict
LX-720M/210-132+GG leads on the differences that matter
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.110 %/°C better in heat. 10 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 8 differencesHow alike are they
10
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
8 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
LX-720M/210-132+GG
YH720W-33MHD/MH
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
0.110 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency
23.39 %
23.18 %
0.21 pp more efficient
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Open-circuit voltage
51.39 V
49.82 V
1.57 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.54 A
18.13 A
0.59 A apart
Voltage at max power
43.68 V
41.52 V
2.16 V apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Current at max power
16.49 A
17.34 A
0.85 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
LX-720M/210-132+GG
24,157 kWh
YH720W-33MHD/MH
24,157 kWh
Lifetime gap
No difference
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
LX-720M/210-132+GG
YH720W-33MHD/MH
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
720 W
720 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.8% of rated power
694 W
682 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.5% of rated power
668 W
644 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.2% of rated power
642 W
607 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
LX-720M/210-132+GG
YH720W-33MHD/MH
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
720 Wp
720 Wp
Same
Module efficiency
23.39 %
23.18 %
+0.21 pp for LX-720M/210-132+GG
Power density
231.8 Wp/m²
231.8 Wp/m²
Same
Open-circuit voltage
51.39 V
49.82 V
1.57 V apart
Voltage at max power
43.68 V
41.52 V
2.16 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.54 A
18.13 A
0.59 A apart
Current at max power
16.49 A
17.34 A
0.85 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
+0.110 %/°C for LX-720M/210-132+GG
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
38.7 kg
38.0 kg
Effectively the same
Weight per kWp
53.8 kg/kWp
52.8 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#925
vs
#1,424
LX-720M/210-132+GG leads by 499 places
Power density
#1,347
vs
#1,347
Tied - the same position in the database
Heat behaviour
#13
vs
#10,419
LX-720M/210-132+GG leads by 10,406 places
Weight
#7,805
vs
#6,459
YH720W-33MHD/MH leads by 1,346 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#17
vs
#24
LX-720M/210-132+GG leads by 7 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+GG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-710M/210-132+GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-705M/210-132+GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-700M/210-132+GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
IBC Solar
IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH vs IBC Solar YH715W-33MHD/MH
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
IBC Solar
IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH vs IBC Solar YH710W-33MHD/MH
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG or IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH?
According to our database: Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG has higher module efficiency (23.39% vs 23.18%); Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG and IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH?
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG has a module efficiency of 23.39%, while IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH is 23.18%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG use vs IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH?
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG uses HJT cells; IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG and IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH?
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG has a 30 years power warranty; IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG and IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH bifacial panels?
Both Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG and IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 9 Luxor Solar offers · See 2 IBC Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.