Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG vs AE Solar AE CME-132-720
VS
The verdict
10 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.050 %/°C better in heat. 8 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
8
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
10 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
LX-720M/210-132+GG
AE CME-132-720
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.050 %/°C better in heat
Weight
38.7 kg
31.5 kg
7.2 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
53.8 kg/kWp
43.8 kg/kWp
10.0 kg/kWp lighter
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Open-circuit voltage
51.39 V
49.10 V
2.29 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.54 A
18.43 A
0.89 A apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Voltage at max power
43.68 V
41.30 V
2.38 V apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Current at max power
16.49 A
17.43 A
0.94 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
LX-720M/210-132+GG
24,157 kWh
AE CME-132-720
24,157 kWh
Lifetime gap
No difference
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
LX-720M/210-132+GG
AE CME-132-720
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
720 W
720 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
694 W
689 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
668 W
657 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
642 W
626 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
LX-720M/210-132+GG
AE CME-132-720
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
720 Wp
720 Wp
Same
Module efficiency
23.39 %
23.21 %
Effectively the same
Power density
231.8 Wp/m²
232.1 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
51.39 V
49.10 V
2.29 V apart
Voltage at max power
43.68 V
41.30 V
2.38 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.54 A
18.43 A
0.89 A apart
Current at max power
16.49 A
17.43 A
0.94 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.050 %/°C for LX-720M/210-132+GG
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
3.103 m²
Effectively the same
Weight
38.7 kg
31.5 kg
-7.2 kg for AE CME-132-720
Weight per kWp
53.8 kg/kWp
43.8 kg/kWp
-10.0 kg/kWp for AE CME-132-720
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
0.40 %/yr
Not published by Luxor Solar
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#925
vs
#1,299
LX-720M/210-132+GG leads by 374 places
Power density
#1,347
vs
#1,339
AE CME-132-720 leads by 8 places
Heat behaviour
#13
vs
#2,165
LX-720M/210-132+GG leads by 2,152 places
Weight
#7,805
vs
#336
AE CME-132-720 leads by 7,469 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#17
vs
#19
LX-720M/210-132+GG leads by 2 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+GG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-710M/210-132+GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-705M/210-132+GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-700M/210-132+GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132-720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
6 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132-720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
7 differences, the largest is weight
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG or AE Solar AE CME-132-720?
According to our database: Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG has higher module efficiency (23.39% vs 23.21%); Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG and AE Solar AE CME-132-720?
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG has a module efficiency of 23.39%, while AE Solar AE CME-132-720 is 23.21%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG use vs AE Solar AE CME-132-720?
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG uses HJT cells; AE Solar AE CME-132-720 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG and AE Solar AE CME-132-720?
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar AE CME-132-720 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG and AE Solar AE CME-132-720 bifacial panels?
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AE Solar AE CME-132-720 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 9 Luxor Solar offers · See 5 AE Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.