Skip to main content
700M/210-132+GG vs 705M/210-132+GG 18 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Luxor Solar LX-700M/210-132+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-705M/210-132+GG

Luxor Solar
LX-700M/210-132+GG
700 Wp 22.74 % HJT Bifacial Incomplete
VS
Luxor Solar
LX-705M/210-132+GG
705 Wp 22.90 % HJT Bifacial Incomplete
The verdict

Identical on every published parameter

All 18 comparable parameters agree, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.

How alike are they
18 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

0 of 18 parameters

Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.

02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.240 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
700M/210-132+GG
23,486 kWh
705M/210-132+GG
23,654 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 700M/210-132+GG 705M/210-132+GG
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 700 W 705 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.4% of rated power 675 W 680 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.8% of rated power 650 W 654 W
Hot roof 70 °C 89.2% of rated power 624 W 629 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 700M/210-132+GG 705M/210-132+GG Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 700 Wp 705 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 22.74 % 22.90 % Effectively the same
Power density 225.3 Wp/m² 227.0 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 50.59 V 50.79 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 43.00 V 43.17 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 17.33 A 17.38 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 16.29 A 16.34 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.240 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.7 kg 38.7 kg Same
Weight per kWp 55.3 kg/kWp 54.9 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology HJT HJT Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#3,210 vs #2,359
705M/210-132+GG leads by 851 places
Power density
#3,989 vs #3,361
705M/210-132+GG leads by 628 places
Heat behaviour
#13 vs #13
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,733 vs #9,275
705M/210-132+GG leads by 458 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#93 vs #68
705M/210-132+GG leads by 25 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-700M/210-132+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-700M/210-132+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-700M/210-132+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-710M/210-132+GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-700M/210-132+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-700M/210-132+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-700M/210-132+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-710M/210-132+ GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Luxor Solar LX-700M/210-132+GG or Luxor Solar LX-705M/210-132+GG?
According to our database: Luxor Solar LX-705M/210-132+GG has higher module efficiency (22.90% vs 22.74%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Luxor Solar LX-700M/210-132+GG and Luxor Solar LX-705M/210-132+GG?
Luxor Solar LX-700M/210-132+GG has a module efficiency of 22.74%, while Luxor Solar LX-705M/210-132+GG is 22.90%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Luxor Solar LX-700M/210-132+GG use vs Luxor Solar LX-705M/210-132+GG?
Luxor Solar LX-700M/210-132+GG uses HJT cells; Luxor Solar LX-705M/210-132+GG uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Luxor Solar LX-700M/210-132+GG and Luxor Solar LX-705M/210-132+GG?
Luxor Solar LX-700M/210-132+GG has a 30 years power warranty; Luxor Solar LX-705M/210-132+GG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Luxor Solar LX-700M/210-132+GG and Luxor Solar LX-705M/210-132+GG bifacial panels?
Both Luxor Solar LX-700M/210-132+GG and Luxor Solar LX-705M/210-132+GG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 9 Luxor Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.