Skip to main content
LX-410M/182-108+GG vs LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG 14 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Luxor Solar LX-410M/182-108+GG vs Luxor Solar LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG

Luxor Solar
LX-410M/182-108+GG
410 Wp 21.33 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Luxor Solar
LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG
425 Wp 22.10 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.77 pp more efficient. 14 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 4 differences
How alike are they
14 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

4 of 18 parameters
Parameter LX-410M/182-108+GG LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG Difference
Module efficiency 21.33 % 22.10 % 0.77 pp more efficient
Power density 210.0 Wp/m² 217.6 Wp/m² 7.7 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 410 Wp 425 Wp 15 W more power
Weight per kWp 58.5 kg/kWp 56.5 kg/kWp 2.1 kg/kWp lighter
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
LX-410M/182-108+GG
13,756 kWh
LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG
14,260 kWh
Lifetime gap
504 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario LX-410M/182-108+GG LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 410 W 425 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 392 W 406 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 373 W 387 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 355 W 368 W
03

Full specification

Parameter LX-410M/182-108+GG LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 410 Wp 425 Wp +15 W for LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG
Module efficiency 21.33 % 22.10 % +0.77 pp for LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG
Power density 210.0 Wp/m² 217.6 Wp/m² +7.7 Wp/m² for LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG
Open-circuit voltage 37.63 V 38.32 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 31.08 V 31.65 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.92 A 14.18 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.20 A 13.44 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1722x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.953 m² 1.953 m² Same
Weight 24.0 kg 24.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 58.5 kg/kWp 56.5 kg/kWp -2.1 kg/kWp for LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - 0.34 %/yr Not published by Luxor Solar
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#8,476 vs #6,012
LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG leads by 2,464 places
Power density
#9,772 vs #7,172
LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG leads by 2,600 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#11,776 vs #10,661
LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG leads by 1,115 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,162 vs #6,559
LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG leads by 1,603 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX - 430 M/182-108+ GG
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX - 420 M/182-108+ GG
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX - 415 M/182-108+ GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX - 410 M/182-108+ GG
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-410M/182-108+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-410M/182-108+GG vs Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Luxor Solar LX-410M/182-108+GG or Luxor Solar LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG?
According to our database: Luxor Solar LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG has higher module efficiency (22.10% vs 21.33%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Luxor Solar LX-410M/182-108+GG and Luxor Solar LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG?
Luxor Solar LX-410M/182-108+GG has a module efficiency of 21.33%, while Luxor Solar LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG is 22.10%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Luxor Solar LX-410M/182-108+GG use vs Luxor Solar LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG?
Luxor Solar LX-410M/182-108+GG uses TOPCon cells; Luxor Solar LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Luxor Solar LX-410M/182-108+GG and Luxor Solar LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG?
Luxor Solar LX-410M/182-108+GG has a 30 years power warranty; Luxor Solar LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Luxor Solar LX-410M/182-108+GG and Luxor Solar LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG bifacial panels?
Both Luxor Solar LX-410M/182-108+GG and Luxor Solar LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 8 Luxor Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.