Skip to main content
LR7-72HVHF-670M vs LR8-66HYD-670M 8 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M

Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M
LR7-72HVHF-670M
670 Wp 24.80 % N-type
VS
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M
LR8-66HYD-670M
670 Wp 24.80 % Back Contact Bifacial Incomplete
The verdict

LR7-72HVHF-670M leads on the differences that matter

The largest is weight: 5.0 kg lighter. 8 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 10 differences
How alike are they
8 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

10 of 18 parameters
Parameter LR7-72HVHF-670M LR8-66HYD-670M Difference
Weight 28.5 kg 33.5 kg 5.0 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 42.5 kg/kWp 50.0 kg/kWp 7.5 kg/kWp lighter
Product warranty 15 yrs 12 yrs 3 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage 54.30 V 50.12 V 4.18 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.60 A 16.86 A 1.26 A apart
Cell technology N-type Back Contact N-type vs Back Contact
Cell count 144 132 12 cells apart
Voltage at max power 44.96 V 41.38 V 3.58 V apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Current at max power 14.91 A 16.19 A 1.28 A apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
LR7-72HVHF-670M
22,480 kWh
LR8-66HYD-670M
22,480 kWh
Lifetime gap
No difference
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario LR7-72HVHF-670M LR8-66HYD-670M
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 670 W 670 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.1% of rated power 644 W 644 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.2% of rated power 618 W 618 W
Hot roof 70 °C 88.3% of rated power 592 W 592 W
03

Full specification

Parameter LR7-72HVHF-670M LR8-66HYD-670M Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 670 Wp 670 Wp Same
Module efficiency 24.80 % 24.80 % Same
Power density 248.0 Wp/m² 248.0 Wp/m² Same
Open-circuit voltage 54.30 V 50.12 V 4.18 V apart
Voltage at max power 44.96 V 41.38 V 3.58 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.60 A 16.86 A 1.26 A apart
Current at max power 14.91 A 16.19 A 1.28 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.260 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.701 m² 2.701 m² Same
Weight 28.5 kg 33.5 kg -5.0 kg for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Weight per kWp 42.5 kg/kWp 50.0 kg/kWp -7.5 kg/kWp for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 12 yrs +3 yrs for LR7-72HVHF-670M
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr - Not published by Longi Solar
Technology
Cell technology N-type Back Contact N-type vs Back Contact
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 132 12 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#12 vs #12
Tied - the same position in the database
Power density
#14 vs #14
Tied - the same position in the database
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#226 vs #3,317
LR7-72HVHF-670M leads by 3,091 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#284 vs #490
LR7-72HVHF-670M leads by 206 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-665M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-660M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-655M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-650M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-640M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M or Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M?
According to our database: both panels are closely matched on key specs - the decision often comes down to price and local availability. See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M and Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M?
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M has a module efficiency of 24.80%, while Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M is 24.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M use vs Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M?
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M uses N-type cells; Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M and Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M?
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M has a 30 years power warranty; Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M and Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M bifacial panels?
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 150 Longi Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.