Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M vs DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640W
VS
The verdict
LR7-72HVHF-645M leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.00 pp more efficient. 4 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
14 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
LR7-72HVHF-645M
DHN-78X16/DG-640W
Difference
Module efficiency
23.90 %
22.90 %
1.00 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Power density
238.8 Wp/m²
229.0 Wp/m²
9.8 Wp/m² higher
Weight
28.5 kg
34.2 kg
5.7 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
44.2 kg/kWp
53.4 kg/kWp
9.3 kg/kWp lighter
Module area
2.701 m²
2.795 m²
0.094 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage
53.80 V
56.40 V
2.60 V apart
Cell technology
N-type
TOPCon
N-type vs TOPCon
Cell count
144
156
12 cells apart
Short-circuit current
15.21 A
14.32 A
0.89 A apart
Voltage at max power
44.46 V
47.60 V
3.14 V apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Current at max power
14.51 A
13.45 A
1.06 A apart
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2465x1134x34 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2465x1134x34 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
LR7-72HVHF-645M
21,641 kWh
DHN-78X16/DG-640W
21,473 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
LR7-72HVHF-645M
DHN-78X16/DG-640W
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
645 W
640 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
620 W
612 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
595 W
584 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
570 W
556 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
LR7-72HVHF-645M
DHN-78X16/DG-640W
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
645 Wp
640 Wp
Effectively the same
Module efficiency
23.90 %
22.90 %
+1.00 pp for LR7-72HVHF-645M
Power density
238.8 Wp/m²
229.0 Wp/m²
+9.8 Wp/m² for LR7-72HVHF-645M
Open-circuit voltage
53.80 V
56.40 V
2.60 V apart
Voltage at max power
44.46 V
47.60 V
3.14 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.21 A
14.32 A
0.89 A apart
Current at max power
14.51 A
13.45 A
1.06 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for LR7-72HVHF-645M
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2465x1134x34 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2465x1134x34 mm
Module area
2.701 m²
2.795 m²
0.094 m² apart
Weight
28.5 kg
34.2 kg
-5.7 kg for LR7-72HVHF-645M
Weight per kWp
44.2 kg/kWp
53.4 kg/kWp
-9.3 kg/kWp for LR7-72HVHF-645M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
-
Not published by DAH Solar
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
TOPCon
N-type vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
156
12 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#378
vs
#2,412
LR7-72HVHF-645M leads by 2,034 places
Power density
#383
vs
#2,443
LR7-72HVHF-645M leads by 2,060 places
Heat behaviour
#515
vs
#2,220
LR7-72HVHF-645M leads by 1,705 places
Weight
#388
vs
#7,431
LR7-72HVHF-645M leads by 7,043 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,016
vs
#1,725
LR7-72HVHF-645M leads by 709 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-665M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-660M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-655M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-650M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-640M
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M or DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640W?
According to our database: Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M has higher module efficiency (23.90% vs 22.90%); Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M and DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640W?
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M has a module efficiency of 23.90%, while DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640 W is 22.90%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M use vs DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640W?
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M uses N-type cells; DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M and DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640W?
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M has a 30 years power warranty; DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M and DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640W bifacial panels?
DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640 W is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 152 Longi Solar offers · See 8 DAH Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
