DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640W vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M
VS
The verdict
LR7-72HVHF-645M leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.00 pp more efficient. 4 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
14 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
DHN-78X16/DG-640W
LR7-72HVHF-645M
Difference
Module efficiency
22.90 %
23.90 %
1.00 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Power density
229.0 Wp/m²
238.8 Wp/m²
9.8 Wp/m² higher
Weight
34.2 kg
28.5 kg
5.7 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
53.4 kg/kWp
44.2 kg/kWp
9.3 kg/kWp lighter
Module area
2.795 m²
2.701 m²
0.094 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage
56.40 V
53.80 V
2.60 V apart
Cell technology
TOPCon
N-type
TOPCon vs N-type
Cell count
156
144
12 cells apart
Short-circuit current
14.32 A
15.21 A
0.89 A apart
Voltage at max power
47.60 V
44.46 V
3.14 V apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Current at max power
13.45 A
14.51 A
1.06 A apart
Dimensions
2465x1134x34 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
2465x1134x34 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
DHN-78X16/DG-640W
21,473 kWh
LR7-72HVHF-645M
21,641 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
DHN-78X16/DG-640W
LR7-72HVHF-645M
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
640 W
645 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
612 W
620 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
584 W
595 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
556 W
570 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
DHN-78X16/DG-640W
LR7-72HVHF-645M
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
640 Wp
645 Wp
Effectively the same
Module efficiency
22.90 %
23.90 %
+1.00 pp for LR7-72HVHF-645M
Power density
229.0 Wp/m²
238.8 Wp/m²
+9.8 Wp/m² for LR7-72HVHF-645M
Open-circuit voltage
56.40 V
53.80 V
2.60 V apart
Voltage at max power
47.60 V
44.46 V
3.14 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.32 A
15.21 A
0.89 A apart
Current at max power
13.45 A
14.51 A
1.06 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for LR7-72HVHF-645M
Mechanical
Dimensions
2465x1134x34 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
2465x1134x34 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.795 m²
2.701 m²
0.094 m² apart
Weight
34.2 kg
28.5 kg
-5.7 kg for LR7-72HVHF-645M
Weight per kWp
53.4 kg/kWp
44.2 kg/kWp
-9.3 kg/kWp for LR7-72HVHF-645M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
0.35 %/yr
Not published by DAH Solar
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
N-type
TOPCon vs N-type
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
156
144
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#2,412
vs
#378
LR7-72HVHF-645M leads by 2,034 places
Power density
#2,443
vs
#383
LR7-72HVHF-645M leads by 2,060 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220
vs
#515
LR7-72HVHF-645M leads by 1,705 places
Weight
#7,431
vs
#388
LR7-72HVHF-645M leads by 7,043 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,725
vs
#1,016
LR7-72HVHF-645M leads by 709 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640W vs DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-635W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640W vs DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-630W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640W vs DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-625W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAH Solar
DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640W vs DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-620W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-670M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-665M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640W or Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M?
According to our database: Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M has higher module efficiency (23.90% vs 22.90%); Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640W and Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M?
DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640 W has a module efficiency of 22.90%, while Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M is 23.90%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640W use vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M?
DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640 W uses TOPCon cells; Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640W and Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M?
DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640 W has a 30 years power warranty; Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640W and Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M bifacial panels?
DAH Solar DHN-78X16/DG-640 W is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Longi Solar LR7-72HVHF-645M is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 8 DAH Solar offers · See 152 Longi Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
