Longi Solar LR7-72HTH-605M vs Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M
VS
The verdict
LR8-66HYD-670M leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 2.40 pp more efficient. 3 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 15 differencesHow alike are they
3
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
15 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
LR7-72HTH-605M
LR8-66HYD-670M
Difference
Module efficiency
22.40 %
24.80 %
2.40 pp more efficient
Rated power
605 Wp
670 Wp
65 W more power
Power density
224.0 Wp/m²
248.0 Wp/m²
24.1 Wp/m² higher
Performance warranty
25 yrs
30 yrs
5 yrs longer
Weight
28.5 kg
33.5 kg
5.0 kg lighter
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
3 yrs longer
Short-circuit current
14.74 A
16.86 A
2.12 A apart
Cell technology
N-type
Back Contact
N-type vs Back Contact
Weight per kWp
47.1 kg/kWp
50.0 kg/kWp
2.9 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage
52.27 V
50.12 V
2.15 V apart
Current at max power
13.75 A
16.19 A
2.44 A apart
Cell count
144
132
12 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Voltage at max power
44.03 V
41.38 V
2.65 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
LR7-72HTH-605M
20,299 kWh
LR8-66HYD-670M
22,480 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,181 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
LR7-72HTH-605M
LR8-66HYD-670M
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
605 W
670 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.8% of rated power
580 W
644 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.6% of rated power
554 W
618 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.4% of rated power
529 W
592 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
LR7-72HTH-605M
LR8-66HYD-670M
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
605 Wp
670 Wp
+65 W for LR8-66HYD-670M
Module efficiency
22.40 %
24.80 %
+2.40 pp for LR8-66HYD-670M
Power density
224.0 Wp/m²
248.0 Wp/m²
+24.1 Wp/m² for LR8-66HYD-670M
Open-circuit voltage
52.27 V
50.12 V
2.15 V apart
Voltage at max power
44.03 V
41.38 V
2.65 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.74 A
16.86 A
2.12 A apart
Current at max power
13.75 A
16.19 A
2.44 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for LR8-66HYD-670M
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
2.701 m²
2.701 m²
Same
Weight
28.5 kg
33.5 kg
-5.0 kg for LR7-72HTH-605M
Weight per kWp
47.1 kg/kWp
50.0 kg/kWp
-2.9 kg/kWp for LR7-72HTH-605M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
+3 yrs for LR7-72HTH-605M
Performance warranty
25 yrs
30 yrs
+5 yrs for LR8-66HYD-670M
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
-
Not published by Longi Solar
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
Back Contact
N-type vs Back Contact
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
132
12 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#4,774
vs
#12
LR8-66HYD-670M leads by 4,762 places
Power density
#4,780
vs
#14
LR8-66HYD-670M leads by 4,766 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309
vs
#511
LR8-66HYD-670M leads by 798 places
Weight
#1,498
vs
#3,317
LR7-72HTH-605M leads by 1,819 places
Warranty
#9,798
vs
#21
LR8-66HYD-670M leads by 9,777 places
Overall
#4,020
vs
#490
LR8-66HYD-670M leads by 3,530 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HTH-605M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HTH-615M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HTH-605M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HTH-610M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M vs Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-665M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M vs Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-660M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HYD-660M
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M vs Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-655M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Longi Solar LR7-72HTH-605M or Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M?
According to our database: Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M has higher module efficiency (24.80% vs 22.40%); Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.280%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Longi Solar LR7-72HTH-605M and Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M?
Longi Solar LR7-72HTH-605M has a module efficiency of 22.40%, while Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M is 24.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Longi Solar LR7-72HTH-605M use vs Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M?
Longi Solar LR7-72HTH-605M uses N-type cells; Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Longi Solar LR7-72HTH-605M and Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M?
Longi Solar LR7-72HTH-605M has a 25 years power warranty; Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Longi Solar LR7-72HTH-605M and Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M bifacial panels?
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Longi Solar LR7-72HTH-605M is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 179 Longi Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

