Longi Solar LR7-60HVH-535M vs Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M
VS
The verdict
LR8-66HYD-670M leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.10 pp more efficient. 3 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 15 differencesHow alike are they
3
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
15 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
LR7-60HVH-535M
LR8-66HYD-670M
Difference
Module efficiency
23.70 %
24.80 %
1.10 pp more efficient
Rated power
535 Wp
670 Wp
135 W more power
Power density
237.1 Wp/m²
248.0 Wp/m²
11.0 Wp/m² higher
Weight
25.0 kg
33.5 kg
8.5 kg lighter
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
3 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
44.78 V
50.12 V
5.34 V apart
Module area
2.257 m²
2.701 m²
0.445 m² apart
Short-circuit current
15.15 A
16.86 A
1.71 A apart
Cell technology
N-type
Back Contact
N-type vs Back Contact
Weight per kWp
46.7 kg/kWp
50.0 kg/kWp
3.3 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power
37.01 V
41.38 V
4.37 V apart
Cell count
120
132
12 cells apart
Current at max power
14.46 A
16.19 A
1.73 A apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
1990x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
1990x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
LR7-60HVH-535M
17,950 kWh
LR8-66HYD-670M
22,480 kWh
Lifetime gap
4,530 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
LR7-60HVH-535M
LR8-66HYD-670M
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
535 W
670 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
96.1% of rated power
514 W
644 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
92.2% of rated power
493 W
618 W
Hot roof
70 °C
88.3% of rated power
472 W
592 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
LR7-60HVH-535M
LR8-66HYD-670M
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
535 Wp
670 Wp
+135 W for LR8-66HYD-670M
Module efficiency
23.70 %
24.80 %
+1.10 pp for LR8-66HYD-670M
Power density
237.1 Wp/m²
248.0 Wp/m²
+11.0 Wp/m² for LR8-66HYD-670M
Open-circuit voltage
44.78 V
50.12 V
5.34 V apart
Voltage at max power
37.01 V
41.38 V
4.37 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.15 A
16.86 A
1.71 A apart
Current at max power
14.46 A
16.19 A
1.73 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1990x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
1990x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.257 m²
2.701 m²
0.445 m² apart
Weight
25.0 kg
33.5 kg
-8.5 kg for LR7-60HVH-535M
Weight per kWp
46.7 kg/kWp
50.0 kg/kWp
-3.3 kg/kWp for LR7-60HVH-535M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
+3 yrs for LR7-60HVH-535M
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
-
Not published by Longi Solar
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
Back Contact
N-type vs Back Contact
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
120
132
12 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#517
vs
#12
LR8-66HYD-670M leads by 505 places
Power density
#517
vs
#14
LR8-66HYD-670M leads by 503 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#1,319
vs
#3,317
LR7-60HVH-535M leads by 1,998 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,933
vs
#490
LR8-66HYD-670M leads by 3,443 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-60HVH-535M vs Longi Solar LR7-60HVH-560M
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-60HVH-535M vs Longi Solar LR7-60HVH-555M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-60HVH-535M vs Longi Solar LR7-60HVH-550M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-60HVH-535M vs Longi Solar LR7-60HVH-545M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-60HVH-535M vs Longi Solar LR7-60HVH-540M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M vs Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-665M
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Longi Solar LR7-60HVH-535M or Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M?
According to our database: Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M has higher module efficiency (24.80% vs 23.70%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Longi Solar LR7-60HVH-535M and Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M?
Longi Solar LR7-60HVH-535M has a module efficiency of 23.70%, while Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M is 24.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Longi Solar LR7-60HVH-535M use vs Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M?
Longi Solar LR7-60HVH-535M uses N-type cells; Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Longi Solar LR7-60HVH-535M and Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M?
Longi Solar LR7-60HVH-535M has a 30 years power warranty; Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Longi Solar LR7-60HVH-535M and Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M bifacial panels?
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Longi Solar LR7-60HVH-535M is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 174 Longi Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

