Skip to main content
LR7-54HVB-495M vs AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw 13 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-495M vs AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw

Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-495M
LR7-54HVB-495M
495 Wp 24.30 % N-type
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw
AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw
495 Wp 24.80 % Back Contact
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.50 pp more efficient. 13 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 5 differences
How alike are they
13 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

5 of 18 parameters
Parameter LR7-54HVB-495M AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw Difference
Module efficiency 24.30 % 24.80 % 0.50 pp more efficient
Power density 242.5 Wp/m² 247.7 Wp/m² 5.2 Wp/m² higher
Cell technology N-type Back Contact N-type vs Back Contact
Module area 2.041 m² 1.998 m² 0.043 m² apart
Dimensions 1800x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 1800x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
LR7-54HVB-495M
16,737 kWh
AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw
16,737 kWh
Lifetime gap
No difference
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario LR7-54HVB-495M AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 495 W 495 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.1% of rated power 476 W 476 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.2% of rated power 456 W 456 W
Hot roof 70 °C 88.3% of rated power 437 W 437 W
03

Full specification

Parameter LR7-54HVB-495M AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 495 Wp 495 Wp Same
Module efficiency 24.30 % 24.80 % +0.50 pp for AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw
Power density 242.5 Wp/m² 247.7 Wp/m² +5.2 Wp/m² for AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw
Open-circuit voltage 40.64 V 41.10 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 33.62 V 34.50 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 15.43 A 15.00 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 14.73 A 14.35 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.260 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1800x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 1800x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.041 m² 1.998 m² 0.043 m² apart
Weight 21.6 kg 21.0 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 43.6 kg/kWp 42.4 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty - 15 yrs Not published by Longi Solar
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.35 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type Back Contact N-type vs Back Contact
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#131 vs #12
AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw leads by 119 places
Power density
#159 vs #37
AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw leads by 122 places
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#318 vs #219
AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw leads by 99 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#7,722 vs #3,920
AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw leads by 3,802 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-495M vs Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-490M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-495M vs Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-485M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-495M vs Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-480M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-495M vs Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-475M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A490-MCE54Mw
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw vs AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Mw
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-495M or AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw?
According to our database: AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw has higher module efficiency (24.80% vs 24.30%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-495M and AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw?
Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-495M has a module efficiency of 24.30%, while AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw is 24.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-495M use vs AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw?
Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-495M uses N-type cells; AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-495M and AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw?
Longi Solar LR7-54HVB-495M has a 30 years power warranty; AIKO AIKO-A495-MCE54Mw has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Compare Longi Solar and AIKO as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 174 Longi Solar offers · See 179 AIKO offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.