Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M vs Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M
VS
The verdict
14 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is rated power: 170 W more power. 4 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
14 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
LR7-54HJD-500M
LR8-66HYD-670M
Difference
Rated power
500 Wp
670 Wp
170 W more power
Weight
23.5 kg
33.5 kg
10.0 kg lighter
Product warranty
30 yrs
12 yrs
18 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
Open-circuit voltage
41.35 V
50.12 V
8.77 V apart
Module area
2.041 m²
2.701 m²
0.660 m² apart
Module efficiency
24.50 %
24.80 %
0.30 pp more efficient
Short-circuit current
15.30 A
16.86 A
1.56 A apart
Weight per kWp
47.0 kg/kWp
50.0 kg/kWp
3.0 kg/kWp lighter
Power density
245.0 Wp/m²
248.0 Wp/m²
3.1 Wp/m² higher
Voltage at max power
34.17 V
41.38 V
7.21 V apart
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Current at max power
14.63 A
16.19 A
1.56 A apart
Dimensions
1800x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
1800x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
LR7-54HJD-500M
16,776 kWh
LR8-66HYD-670M
22,480 kWh
Lifetime gap
5,704 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
LR7-54HJD-500M
LR8-66HYD-670M
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
500 W
670 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
96.1% of rated power
482 W
644 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
92.2% of rated power
464 W
618 W
Hot roof
70 °C
88.3% of rated power
446 W
592 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
LR7-54HJD-500M
LR8-66HYD-670M
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
500 Wp
670 Wp
+170 W for LR8-66HYD-670M
Module efficiency
24.50 %
24.80 %
+0.30 pp for LR8-66HYD-670M
Power density
245.0 Wp/m²
248.0 Wp/m²
+3.1 Wp/m² for LR8-66HYD-670M
Open-circuit voltage
41.35 V
50.12 V
8.77 V apart
Voltage at max power
34.17 V
41.38 V
7.21 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.30 A
16.86 A
1.56 A apart
Current at max power
14.63 A
16.19 A
1.56 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for LR7-54HJD-500M
Mechanical
Dimensions
1800x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
1800x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.041 m²
2.701 m²
0.660 m² apart
Weight
23.5 kg
33.5 kg
-10.0 kg for LR7-54HJD-500M
Weight per kWp
47.0 kg/kWp
50.0 kg/kWp
-3.0 kg/kWp for LR7-54HJD-500M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
12 yrs
+18 yrs for LR7-54HJD-500M
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
-
Not published by Longi Solar
Technology
Cell technology
Back Contact
Back Contact
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#74
vs
#12
LR8-66HYD-670M leads by 62 places
Power density
#77
vs
#14
LR8-66HYD-670M leads by 63 places
Heat behaviour
#13
vs
#511
LR7-54HJD-500M leads by 498 places
Weight
#1,450
vs
#3,317
LR7-54HJD-500M leads by 1,867 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,611
vs
#490
LR8-66HYD-670M leads by 1,121 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M vs Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M vs Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-505M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M vs Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-495M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M vs Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-665M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M vs Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-660M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HYD-660M
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M or Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M?
According to our database: Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M has higher module efficiency (24.80% vs 24.50%); Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.260%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M and Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M?
Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M has a module efficiency of 24.50%, while Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M is 24.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M use vs Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M?
Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M uses Back Contact cells; Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M and Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M?
Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M has a 30 years power warranty; Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M and Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M bifacial panels?
Both Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M and Longi Solar LR8-66HYD-670M are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 147 Longi Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

