Skip to main content
54HJD-495M vs 72HVH-670M 5 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-495M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-670M

Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-495M
LR7-54HJD-495M
495 Wp 24.30 % Back Contact Bifacial
VS
Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-670M
LR7-72HVH-670M
670 Wp 24.80 % N-type
The verdict

14 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is rated power: 175 W more power. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 14 differences
How alike are they
5 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

14 of 19 parameters
Parameter 54HJD-495M 72HVH-670M Difference
Rated power 495 Wp 670 Wp 175 W more power
Module efficiency 24.30 % 24.80 % 0.50 pp more efficient
Weight 23.5 kg 28.5 kg 5.0 kg lighter
Product warranty 30 yrs 15 yrs 15 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.260 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat
Open-circuit voltage 41.25 V 54.30 V 13.05 V apart
Module area 2.041 m² 2.701 m² 0.660 m² apart
Weight per kWp 47.5 kg/kWp 42.5 kg/kWp 4.9 kg/kWp lighter
Power density 242.5 Wp/m² 248.0 Wp/m² 5.5 Wp/m² higher
Cell technology Back Contact N-type Back Contact vs N-type
Voltage at max power 34.07 V 44.96 V 10.89 V apart
Cell count 108 144 36 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Dimensions 1800x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 1800x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
54HJD-495M
16,737 kWh
72HVH-670M
22,655 kWh
Lifetime gap
5,918 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 54HJD-495M 72HVH-670M
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 495 W 670 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.1% of rated power 477 W 644 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.2% of rated power 459 W 618 W
Hot roof 70 °C 88.3% of rated power 442 W 592 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 54HJD-495M 72HVH-670M Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 495 Wp 670 Wp +175 W for 72HVH-670M
Module efficiency 24.30 % 24.80 % +0.50 pp for 72HVH-670M
Power density 242.5 Wp/m² 248.0 Wp/m² +5.5 Wp/m² for 72HVH-670M
Open-circuit voltage 41.25 V 54.30 V 13.05 V apart
Voltage at max power 34.07 V 44.96 V 10.89 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.19 A 15.60 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 14.53 A 14.91 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.260 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for 54HJD-495M
Mechanical
Dimensions 1800x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 1800x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.041 m² 2.701 m² 0.660 m² apart
Weight 23.5 kg 28.5 kg -5.0 kg for 54HJD-495M
Weight per kWp 47.5 kg/kWp 42.5 kg/kWp -4.9 kg/kWp for 72HVH-670M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 15 yrs +15 yrs for 54HJD-495M
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.35 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology Back Contact N-type Back Contact vs N-type
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 144 36 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#131 vs #12
72HVH-670M leads by 119 places
Power density
#159 vs #14
72HVH-670M leads by 145 places
Heat behaviour
#13 vs #511
54HJD-495M leads by 498 places
Weight
#1,708 vs #226
72HVH-670M leads by 1,482 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,810 vs #284
72HVH-670M leads by 1,526 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-495M vs Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-510M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-495M vs Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-505M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-495M vs Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-500M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-665M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-660M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-670M vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-655M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-495M or Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-670M?
According to our database: Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-670M has higher module efficiency (24.80% vs 24.30%); Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-495M tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.260%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-495M and Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-670M?
Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-495M has a module efficiency of 24.30%, while Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-670M is 24.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-495M use vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-670M?
Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-495M uses Back Contact cells; Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-670M uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-495M and Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-670M?
Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-495M has a 30 years power warranty; Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-670M has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-495M and Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-670M bifacial panels?
Longi Solar LR7-54HJD-495M is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-670M is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 147 Longi Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.