Lexron 420W vs Lexron LEXRON 595W
VS
The verdict
LEXRON 595W leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.91 pp more efficient. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
14 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
420W
LEXRON 595W
Difference
Module efficiency
21.12 %
23.03 %
1.91 pp more efficient
Rated power
420 Wp
595 Wp
175 W more power
Power density
211.2 Wp/m²
230.3 Wp/m²
19.2 Wp/m² higher
Weight
22.0 kg
28.0 kg
6.0 kg lighter
Short-circuit current
10.59 A
14.51 A
3.92 A apart
Module area
1.989 m²
2.583 m²
0.594 m² apart
Weight per kWp
52.4 kg/kWp
47.1 kg/kWp
5.3 kg/kWp lighter
Cell technology
PERC
TOPCon
PERC vs TOPCon
Current at max power
10.04 A
13.76 A
3.72 A apart
Cell count
72
144
72 cells apart
Annual degradation
0.45 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
0.05 %/yr slower
Open-circuit voltage
50.20 V
51.90 V
1.70 V apart
Dimensions
1987x1001x35 mm
2278x1134x35 mm
1987x1001x35 mm vs 2278x1134x35 mm
Voltage at max power
41.83 V
43.25 V
1.42 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.350 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
420W
13,831 kWh
LEXRON 595W
19,963 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,132 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
420W
LEXRON 595W
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
420 W
595 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.8% of rated power
398 W
564 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.5% of rated power
376 W
533 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.2% of rated power
354 W
501 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
420W
LEXRON 595W
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
420 Wp
595 Wp
+175 W for LEXRON 595W
Module efficiency
21.12 %
23.03 %
+1.91 pp for LEXRON 595W
Power density
211.2 Wp/m²
230.3 Wp/m²
+19.2 Wp/m² for LEXRON 595W
Open-circuit voltage
50.20 V
51.90 V
1.70 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.83 V
43.25 V
1.42 V apart
Short-circuit current
10.59 A
14.51 A
3.92 A apart
Current at max power
10.04 A
13.76 A
3.72 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.350 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1987x1001x35 mm
2278x1134x35 mm
1987x1001x35 mm vs 2278x1134x35 mm
Module area
1.989 m²
2.583 m²
0.594 m² apart
Weight
22.0 kg
28.0 kg
-6.0 kg for 420W
Weight per kWp
52.4 kg/kWp
47.1 kg/kWp
-5.3 kg/kWp for LEXRON 595W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.45 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
-0.05 %/yr for LEXRON 595W
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
TOPCon
PERC vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
72
144
72 cells apart
Bifacial
No
No
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#9,255
vs
#1,744
LEXRON 595W leads by 7,511 places
Power density
#9,255
vs
#1,758
LEXRON 595W leads by 7,497 places
Heat behaviour
#10,419
vs
#10,419
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,859
vs
#1,481
LEXRON 595W leads by 4,378 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#10,850
vs
#3,257
LEXRON 595W leads by 7,593 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Lexron
Lexron 420W vs Lexron 430W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Lexron
Lexron 420W vs Lexron 425W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Lexron
Lexron 420W vs Lexron 415W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Lexron
Lexron 420W vs Lexron 410W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Lexron
Lexron 420W vs Lexron 405W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Lexron
Lexron LEXRON 595W vs Lexron LEXRON 600W
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Lexron 420W or Lexron LEXRON 595W?
According to our database: Lexron LEXRON 595 W has higher module efficiency (23.03% vs 21.12%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Lexron 420W and Lexron LEXRON 595W?
Lexron 420 W has a module efficiency of 21.12%, while Lexron LEXRON 595 W is 23.03%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Lexron 420W use vs Lexron LEXRON 595W?
Lexron 420 W uses PERC cells; Lexron LEXRON 595 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Lexron 420W and Lexron LEXRON 595W?
Lexron 420 W has a 30 years power warranty; Lexron LEXRON 595 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.