Skip to main content
M705N66UB-SF-F7 vs M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

LEDVANCE M705N66UB-SF-F7 vs LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695

LEDVANCE M705N66UB-SF-F7
LEDVANCE
M705N66UB-SF-F7
705 Wp 22.70 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695
LEDVANCE
M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695
695 Wp 22.37 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

M705N66UB-SF-F7 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.33 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter M705N66UB-SF-F7 M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 Difference
Module efficiency 22.70 % 22.37 % 0.33 pp more efficient
Power density 227.0 Wp/m² 223.7 Wp/m² 3.2 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 705 Wp 695 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared annual degradation, with a 1.0% first-year loss assumed for both panels because at least one datasheet omits it, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
M705N66UB-SF-F7
23,654 kWh
M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695
23,319 kWh
Lifetime gap
335 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario M705N66UB-SF-F7 M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 705 W 695 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 673 W 664 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 642 W 632 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 610 W 601 W
03

Full specification

Parameter M705N66UB-SF-F7 M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 705 Wp 695 Wp +10 W for M705N66UB-SF-F7
Module efficiency 22.70 % 22.37 % +0.33 pp for M705N66UB-SF-F7
Power density 227.0 Wp/m² 223.7 Wp/m² +3.2 Wp/m² for M705N66UB-SF-F7
Open-circuit voltage 48.20 V 47.90 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 40.70 V 40.30 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.36 A 18.28 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.33 A 17.25 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 34.5 kg 34.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 48.9 kg/kWp 49.6 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#3,307 vs #4,970
M705N66UB-SF-F7 leads by 1,663 places
Power density
#3,361 vs #4,877
M705N66UB-SF-F7 leads by 1,516 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,611 vs #3,186
M705N66UB-SF-F7 leads by 575 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#166 vs #275
M705N66UB-SF-F7 leads by 109 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
LEDVANCE
LEDVANCE M705N66UB-SF-F7 vs LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-705
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
LEDVANCE
LEDVANCE M705N66UB-SF-F7 vs LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-700
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
LEDVANCE
LEDVANCE M705N66UB-SF-F7 vs LEDVANCE M700N66UB-SF-F7
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
LEDVANCE
LEDVANCE M705N66UB-SF-F7 vs LEDVANCE M695N66UB-SF-F7
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
LEDVANCE
LEDVANCE M705N66UB-SF-F7 vs LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-690
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
LEDVANCE
LEDVANCE M705N66UB-SF-F7 vs LEDVANCE M690N66UB-SF-F7
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: LEDVANCE M705N66UB-SF-F7 or LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695?
According to our database: LEDVANCE M705N66UB-SF-F7 has higher module efficiency (22.70% vs 22.37%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of LEDVANCE M705N66UB-SF-F7 and LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695?
LEDVANCE M705N66UB-SF-F7 has a module efficiency of 22.70%, while LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 is 22.37%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does LEDVANCE M705N66UB-SF-F7 use vs LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695?
LEDVANCE M705N66UB-SF-F7 uses TOPCon cells; LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on LEDVANCE M705N66UB-SF-F7 and LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695?
LEDVANCE M705N66UB-SF-F7 has a 30 years power warranty; LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are LEDVANCE M705N66UB-SF-F7 and LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 bifacial panels?
Both LEDVANCE M705N66UB-SF-F7 and LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 5 LEDVANCE offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.