LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W vs LP182*210-M-54-NB-505W 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Leapton LP210210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP182210-M-54-NB-505W

Q: Which panel is better: Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W or Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-505W?

According to our database: Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W has higher module efficiency (23.12% vs 22.71%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

Q: What is the efficiency of Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W and Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-505W?

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W has a module efficiency of 23.12%, while Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-505W is 22.71%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

Q: What cell technology does Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W use vs Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-505W?

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W uses TOPCon cells; Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-505W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

Q: What is the warranty on Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W and Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-505W?

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W has a 30 years power warranty; Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-505W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Q: Are Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W and Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-505W bifacial panels?

Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-505W is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Leapton

LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W

715 Wp 23.12 % TOPCon

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

Leapton

LP182*210-M-54-NB-505W

505 Wp 22.71 % TOPCon Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

The verdict

LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 210 W more power. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences

How alike are they

6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical

identical differs

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters

Parameter LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W LP182*210-M-54-NB-505W Difference

Rated power 715 Wp 505 Wp 210 W more power

Weight 34.0 kg 27.7 kg 6.3 kg lighter

Weight per kWp 47.6 kg/kWp 54.9 kg/kWp 7.3 kg/kWp lighter

Module efficiency 23.12 % 22.71 % 0.41 pp more efficient

Open-circuit voltage 48.80 V 40.32 V 8.48 V apart

Short-circuit current 18.61 A 15.96 A 2.65 A apart

Module area 3.106 m² 2.224 m² 0.883 m² apart

Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 227.1 Wp/m² 3.1 Wp/m² higher

Voltage at max power 40.80 V 33.53 V 7.27 V apart

Current at max power 17.52 A 15.06 A 2.46 A apart

Cell count 132 108 24 cells apart

Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes

Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1961x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Cell temperature

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W

23,990 kWh

LP182*210-M-54-NB-505W

16,944 kWh

Lifetime gap

7,046 kWh

Output when it is hot

Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees

Scenario LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W LP182*210-M-54-NB-505W

Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 715 W 505 W

Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 683 W 482 W

Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 651 W 460 W

Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 618 W 437 W

Full specification

Parameter LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W LP182*210-M-54-NB-505W Difference

Power and efficiency

Rated power 715 Wp 505 Wp +210 W for LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W

Module efficiency 23.12 % 22.71 % +0.41 pp for LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W

Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 227.1 Wp/m² +3.1 Wp/m² for LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W

Open-circuit voltage 48.80 V 40.32 V 8.48 V apart

Voltage at max power 40.80 V 33.53 V 7.27 V apart

Short-circuit current 18.61 A 15.96 A 2.65 A apart

Current at max power 17.52 A 15.06 A 2.46 A apart

Temperature

Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same

Mechanical

Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1961x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm

Module area 3.106 m² 2.224 m² 0.883 m² apart

Weight 34.0 kg 27.7 kg -6.3 kg for LP182*210-M-54-NB-505W

Weight per kWp 47.6 kg/kWp 54.9 kg/kWp -7.3 kg/kWp for LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W

Warranty and degradation

Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same

Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same

Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same

Technology

Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same

Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same

Cell count 132 108 24 cells apart

Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes

Against the whole database

14,129 panels

Efficiency

#1,614 vs #3,342

LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W leads by 1,728 places

Power density

#2,070 vs #3,369

LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W leads by 1,299 places

Heat behaviour

#6,152 vs #6,152

Tied - the same position in the database

Weight

#1,753 vs #9,330

LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W leads by 7,577 places

Warranty

#21 vs #21

Tied - the same position in the database

Overall

#92 vs #4,241

LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W leads by 4,149 places

More useful comparisons

Open the full database

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W

The same specification on paper

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-710W

One difference: module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-705W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-700W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-695W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-690W

5 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Written summary

Checking cache...

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W or Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-505W?

According to our database: Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715 W has higher module efficiency (23.12% vs 22.71%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

What is the efficiency of Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W and Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-505W?

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715 W has a module efficiency of 23.12%, while Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-505 W is 22.71%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

What cell technology does Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W use vs Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-505W?

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715 W uses TOPCon cells; Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-505 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

What is the warranty on Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W and Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-505W?

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715 W has a 30 years power warranty; Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-505 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Are Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W and Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-505W bifacial panels?

Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-505 W is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 9 Leapton offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.