LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W vs LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W 5 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Leapton LP210210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP182182-M-60-NB-495W

Q: Which panel is better: Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W or Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W?

According to our database: Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W has higher module efficiency (23.12% vs 22.33%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

Q: What is the efficiency of Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W and Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W?

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W has a module efficiency of 23.12%, while Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W is 22.33%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

Q: What cell technology does Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W use vs Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W?

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W uses TOPCon cells; Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

Q: What is the warranty on Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W and Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W?

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W has a 30 years power warranty; Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Q: Are Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W and Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W bifacial panels?

Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Leapton

LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W

715 Wp 23.12 % TOPCon

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

Leapton

LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W

495 Wp 22.33 % N-type Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

The verdict

LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.79 pp more efficient. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 14 differences

How alike are they

5 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical

identical differs

What actually differs

14 of 19 parameters

Parameter LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W Difference

Module efficiency 23.12 % 22.33 % 0.79 pp more efficient

Rated power 715 Wp 495 Wp 220 W more power

Weight 34.0 kg 27.0 kg 7.0 kg lighter

Weight per kWp 47.6 kg/kWp 54.5 kg/kWp 7.0 kg/kWp lighter

Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 223.3 Wp/m² 6.9 Wp/m² higher

Open-circuit voltage 48.80 V 43.82 V 4.98 V apart

Short-circuit current 18.61 A 14.09 A 4.52 A apart

Module area 3.106 m² 2.217 m² 0.889 m² apart

Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type

Voltage at max power 40.80 V 36.35 V 4.45 V apart

Current at max power 17.52 A 13.62 A 3.90 A apart

Cell count 132 120 12 cells apart

Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes

Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1955x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1955x1134x30 mm

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Cell temperature

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W

23,990 kWh

LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W

16,608 kWh

Lifetime gap

7,382 kWh

Output when it is hot

Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees

Scenario LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W

Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 715 W 495 W

Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 683 W 473 W

Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 651 W 450 W

Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 618 W 428 W

Full specification

Parameter LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W Difference

Power and efficiency

Rated power 715 Wp 495 Wp +220 W for LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W

Module efficiency 23.12 % 22.33 % +0.79 pp for LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W

Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 223.3 Wp/m² +6.9 Wp/m² for LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W

Open-circuit voltage 48.80 V 43.82 V 4.98 V apart

Voltage at max power 40.80 V 36.35 V 4.45 V apart

Short-circuit current 18.61 A 14.09 A 4.52 A apart

Current at max power 17.52 A 13.62 A 3.90 A apart

Temperature

Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same

Mechanical

Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1955x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1955x1134x30 mm

Module area 3.106 m² 2.217 m² 0.889 m² apart

Weight 34.0 kg 27.0 kg -7.0 kg for LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W

Weight per kWp 47.6 kg/kWp 54.5 kg/kWp -7.0 kg/kWp for LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W

Warranty and degradation

Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same

Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same

Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same

Technology

Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type

Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same

Cell count 132 120 12 cells apart

Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes

Against the whole database

14,005 panels

Efficiency

#1,567 vs #5,054

LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W leads by 3,487 places

Power density

#2,018 vs #5,043

LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W leads by 3,025 places

Heat behaviour

#6,093 vs #6,093

Tied - the same position in the database

Weight

#1,753 vs #8,872

LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W leads by 7,119 places

Warranty

#21 vs #21

Tied - the same position in the database

Overall

#92 vs #4,899

LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W leads by 4,807 places

More useful comparisons

Open the full database

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W

The same specification on paper

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-710W

One difference: module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-705W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-700W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-695W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-690W

5 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Written summary

Checking cache...

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W or Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W?

According to our database: Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715 W has higher module efficiency (23.12% vs 22.33%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

What is the efficiency of Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W and Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W?

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715 W has a module efficiency of 23.12%, while Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495 W is 22.33%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

What cell technology does Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W use vs Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W?

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715 W uses TOPCon cells; Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495 W uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

What is the warranty on Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W and Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W?

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715 W has a 30 years power warranty; Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Are Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W and Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W bifacial panels?

Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495 W is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 8 Leapton offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.