Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W
VS
The verdict
LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.79 pp more efficient. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
14 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W
LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W
Difference
Module efficiency
22.33 %
23.12 %
0.79 pp more efficient
Rated power
495 Wp
715 Wp
220 W more power
Weight
27.0 kg
34.0 kg
7.0 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
54.5 kg/kWp
47.6 kg/kWp
7.0 kg/kWp lighter
Power density
223.3 Wp/m²
230.2 Wp/m²
6.9 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage
43.82 V
48.80 V
4.98 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.09 A
18.61 A
4.52 A apart
Module area
2.217 m²
3.106 m²
0.889 m² apart
Cell technology
N-type
TOPCon
N-type vs TOPCon
Voltage at max power
36.35 V
40.80 V
4.45 V apart
Current at max power
13.62 A
17.52 A
3.90 A apart
Cell count
120
132
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Dimensions
1955x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1955x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W
16,608 kWh
LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W
23,990 kWh
Lifetime gap
7,382 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W
LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
495 W
715 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
473 W
683 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
450 W
651 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
428 W
618 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W
LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
495 Wp
715 Wp
+220 W for LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W
Module efficiency
22.33 %
23.12 %
+0.79 pp for LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W
Power density
223.3 Wp/m²
230.2 Wp/m²
+6.9 Wp/m² for LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W
Open-circuit voltage
43.82 V
48.80 V
4.98 V apart
Voltage at max power
36.35 V
40.80 V
4.45 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.09 A
18.61 A
4.52 A apart
Current at max power
13.62 A
17.52 A
3.90 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1955x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1955x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
2.217 m²
3.106 m²
0.889 m² apart
Weight
27.0 kg
34.0 kg
-7.0 kg for LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W
Weight per kWp
54.5 kg/kWp
47.6 kg/kWp
-7.0 kg/kWp for LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
25 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
TOPCon
N-type vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
120
132
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#5,054
vs
#1,567
LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W leads by 3,487 places
Power density
#5,043
vs
#2,018
LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W leads by 3,025 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093
vs
#6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,872
vs
#1,753
LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W leads by 7,119 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,899
vs
#92
LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W leads by 4,807 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-500W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-490W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-485W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-710W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-705W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W or Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W?
According to our database: Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715 W has higher module efficiency (23.12% vs 22.33%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W and Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W?
Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495 W has a module efficiency of 22.33%, while Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715 W is 23.12%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W use vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W?
Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495 W uses N-type cells; Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W and Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W?
Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495 W has a 30 years power warranty; Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495W and Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W bifacial panels?
Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NB-495 W is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 8 Leapton offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

