Skip to main content
NH-705W vs NB-720W 12 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-705W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-705W
Leapton
LP210*210-M-66-NH-705W
705 Wp 22.70 % TOPCon
VS
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W
Leapton
LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W
720 Wp 23.18 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
The verdict

NB-720W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.48 pp more efficient. 12 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 6 differences
How alike are they
12 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

6 of 18 parameters
Parameter NH-705W NB-720W Difference
Module efficiency 22.70 % 23.18 % 0.48 pp more efficient
Weight 34.0 kg 37.5 kg 3.5 kg lighter
Power density 227.0 Wp/m² 231.8 Wp/m² 4.8 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 705 Wp 720 Wp 15 W more power
Weight per kWp 48.2 kg/kWp 52.1 kg/kWp 3.9 kg/kWp lighter
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
NH-705W
23,654 kWh
NB-720W
24,157 kWh
Lifetime gap
503 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario NH-705W NB-720W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 705 W 720 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 673 W 688 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 642 W 655 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 610 W 623 W
03

Full specification

Parameter NH-705W NB-720W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 705 Wp 720 Wp +15 W for NB-720W
Module efficiency 22.70 % 23.18 % +0.48 pp for NB-720W
Power density 227.0 Wp/m² 231.8 Wp/m² +4.8 Wp/m² for NB-720W
Open-circuit voltage 48.40 V 49.00 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 40.40 V 41.00 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.52 A 18.65 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.45 A 17.56 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x33 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 34.0 kg 37.5 kg -3.5 kg for NH-705W
Weight per kWp 48.2 kg/kWp 52.1 kg/kWp -3.9 kg/kWp for NH-705W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr - Not published by Leapton
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#3,307 vs #1,424
NB-720W leads by 1,883 places
Power density
#3,361 vs #1,347
NB-720W leads by 2,014 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,121 vs #5,516
NH-705W leads by 3,395 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#165 vs #78
NB-720W leads by 87 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-705W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-705W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-705W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-710W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-705W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-700W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-705W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-695W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-705W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-690W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-705W or Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W?
According to our database: Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720 W has higher module efficiency (23.18% vs 22.70%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-705W and Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W?
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-705 W has a module efficiency of 22.70%, while Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720 W is 23.18%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-705W use vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W?
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-705 W uses TOPCon cells; Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-705W and Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W?
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-705 W has a 30 years power warranty; Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-705W and Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W bifacial panels?
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720 W is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-705 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 8 Leapton offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.