LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W vs LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W 9 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Leapton LP210210-M-66-NB-720W vs Leapton LP182199-M-66-NB 590W

Q: Which panel is better: Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W or Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W?

According to our database: Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W has higher module efficiency (23.18% vs 22.83%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

Q: What is the efficiency of Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W and Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W?

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W has a module efficiency of 23.18%, while Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W is 22.83%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

Q: What cell technology does Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W use vs Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W?

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W uses TOPCon cells; Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

Q: What is the warranty on Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W and Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W?

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W has a 30 years power warranty; Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Q: Are Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W and Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W bifacial panels?

Both Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W and Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Leapton

LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W

720 Wp 23.18 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

Leapton

LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W

590 Wp 22.83 % TOPCon Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

The verdict

LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 130 W more power. 9 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 9 differences

How alike are they

9 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical

identical differs not published

What actually differs

9 of 18 parameters

Parameter LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W Difference

Rated power 720 Wp 590 Wp 130 W more power

Weight 37.5 kg 32.0 kg 5.5 kg lighter

Module efficiency 23.18 % 22.83 % 0.35 pp more efficient

Short-circuit current 18.65 A 15.32 A 3.33 A apart

Module area 3.106 m² 2.584 m² 0.522 m² apart

Power density 231.8 Wp/m² 228.3 Wp/m² 3.5 Wp/m² higher

Current at max power 17.56 A 14.49 A 3.07 A apart

Weight per kWp 52.1 kg/kWp 54.2 kg/kWp 2.2 kg/kWp lighter

Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2279x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2279x1134x30 mm

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production

A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Cell temperature

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W

24,157 kWh

LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W

19,796 kWh

Lifetime gap

4,361 kWh

Output when it is hot

Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees

Scenario LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W

Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 720 W 590 W

Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 688 W 563 W

Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 655 W 537 W

Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 623 W 510 W

Full specification

Parameter LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W Difference

Power and efficiency

Rated power 720 Wp 590 Wp +130 W for LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W

Module efficiency 23.18 % 22.83 % +0.35 pp for LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W

Power density 231.8 Wp/m² 228.3 Wp/m² +3.5 Wp/m² for LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W

Open-circuit voltage 49.00 V 48.62 V Effectively the same

Voltage at max power 41.00 V 40.72 V Effectively the same

Short-circuit current 18.65 A 15.32 A 3.33 A apart

Current at max power 17.56 A 14.49 A 3.07 A apart

Temperature

Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same

Mechanical

Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2279x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2279x1134x30 mm

Module area 3.106 m² 2.584 m² 0.522 m² apart

Weight 37.5 kg 32.0 kg -5.5 kg for LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W

Weight per kWp 52.1 kg/kWp 54.2 kg/kWp -2.2 kg/kWp for LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W

Warranty and degradation

Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same

Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same

Annual degradation - 0.40 %/yr Not published by Leapton

Technology

Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same

Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same

Cell count 132 132 Same

Bifacial Yes Yes Same

Against the whole database

14,005 panels

Efficiency

#1,424 vs #2,683

LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W leads by 1,259 places

Power density

#1,347 vs #2,731

LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W leads by 1,384 places

Heat behaviour

#6,093 vs #6,093

Tied - the same position in the database

Weight

#5,516 vs #8,477

LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W leads by 2,961 places

Warranty

#21 vs #21

Tied - the same position in the database

Overall

#78 vs #1,591

LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W leads by 1,513 places

More useful comparisons

Open the full database

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-715W

The same specification on paper

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-710W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-705W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-700W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-695W

5 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-690W

6 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Written summary

Checking cache...

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W or Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W?

According to our database: Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720 W has higher module efficiency (23.18% vs 22.83%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

What is the efficiency of Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W and Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W?

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720 W has a module efficiency of 23.18%, while Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590 W is 22.83%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

What cell technology does Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W use vs Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W?

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720 W uses TOPCon cells; Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

What is the warranty on Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W and Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W?

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720 W has a 30 years power warranty; Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Are Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W and Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W bifacial panels?

Both Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720 W and Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 8 Leapton offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.