Skip to main content
715W vs 705W 15 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-705W

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-715W
Leapton
LP210*210-M-66-NB-715W
715 Wp 23.12 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
VS
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-705W
Leapton
LP210*210-M-66-NB-705W
705 Wp 22.70 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
The verdict

715W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.42 pp more efficient. 15 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
15 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

3 of 18 parameters
Parameter 715W 705W Difference
Module efficiency 23.12 % 22.70 % 0.42 pp more efficient
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 227.0 Wp/m² 3.2 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 715 Wp 705 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
715W
23,990 kWh
705W
23,654 kWh
Lifetime gap
336 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 715W 705W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 715 W 705 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 683 W 673 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 651 W 642 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 618 W 610 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 715W 705W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 715 Wp 705 Wp +10 W for 715W
Module efficiency 23.12 % 22.70 % +0.42 pp for 715W
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 227.0 Wp/m² +3.2 Wp/m² for 715W
Open-circuit voltage 48.80 V 48.40 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 40.80 V 40.40 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.61 A 18.52 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.52 A 17.45 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x33 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 37.5 kg 37.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 52.4 kg/kWp 53.2 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,567 vs #3,307
715W leads by 1,740 places
Power density
#2,018 vs #3,361
715W leads by 1,343 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,979 vs #7,016
715W leads by 1,037 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#104 vs #170
715W leads by 66 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-720W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-710W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-700W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-695W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-690W
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Leapton
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W
3 differences, the largest is weight
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-715W or Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-705W?
According to our database: Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-715 W has higher module efficiency (23.12% vs 22.70%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-715W and Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-705W?
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-715 W has a module efficiency of 23.12%, while Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-705 W is 22.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-715W use vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-705W?
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-715 W uses TOPCon cells; Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-705 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-715W and Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-705W?
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-715 W has a 30 years power warranty; Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-705 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-715W and Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-705W bifacial panels?
Both Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-715 W and Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NB-705 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 8 Leapton offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.