LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W vs LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W 9 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Leapton LP182199-M-66-NB 590W vs Leapton LP210210-M-66-NH-720W

Q: Which panel is better: Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W or Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W?

According to our database: Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W has higher module efficiency (23.18% vs 22.83%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

Q: What is the efficiency of Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W and Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W?

Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W has a module efficiency of 22.83%, while Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W is 23.18%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

Q: What cell technology does Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W use vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W?

Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W uses TOPCon cells; Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

Q: What is the warranty on Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W and Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W?

Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W has a 30 years power warranty; Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Q: Are Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W and Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W bifacial panels?

Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Leapton

LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W

590 Wp 22.83 % TOPCon Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

Leapton

LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W

720 Wp 23.18 % TOPCon

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

The verdict

LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 130 W more power. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 10 differences

How alike are they

9 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical

identical differs

What actually differs

10 of 19 parameters

Parameter LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W Difference

Rated power 590 Wp 720 Wp 130 W more power

Weight per kWp 54.2 kg/kWp 47.2 kg/kWp 7.0 kg/kWp lighter

Module efficiency 22.83 % 23.18 % 0.35 pp more efficient

Short-circuit current 15.32 A 18.65 A 3.33 A apart

Module area 2.584 m² 3.106 m² 0.522 m² apart

Weight 32.0 kg 34.0 kg 2.0 kg lighter

Power density 228.3 Wp/m² 231.8 Wp/m² 3.5 Wp/m² higher

Current at max power 14.49 A 17.56 A 3.07 A apart

Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No

Dimensions 2279x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2279x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Cell temperature

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W

19,796 kWh

LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W

24,157 kWh

Lifetime gap

4,361 kWh

Output when it is hot

Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees

Scenario LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W

Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 590 W 720 W

Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 563 W 688 W

Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 537 W 655 W

Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 510 W 623 W

Full specification

Parameter LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W Difference

Power and efficiency

Rated power 590 Wp 720 Wp +130 W for LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W

Module efficiency 22.83 % 23.18 % +0.35 pp for LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W

Power density 228.3 Wp/m² 231.8 Wp/m² +3.5 Wp/m² for LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W

Open-circuit voltage 48.62 V 49.00 V Effectively the same

Voltage at max power 40.72 V 41.00 V Effectively the same

Short-circuit current 15.32 A 18.65 A 3.33 A apart

Current at max power 14.49 A 17.56 A 3.07 A apart

Temperature

Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same

Mechanical

Dimensions 2279x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2279x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm

Module area 2.584 m² 3.106 m² 0.522 m² apart

Weight 32.0 kg 34.0 kg -2.0 kg for LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W

Weight per kWp 54.2 kg/kWp 47.2 kg/kWp -7.0 kg/kWp for LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W

Warranty and degradation

Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same

Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same

Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same

Technology

Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same

Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same

Cell count 132 132 Same

Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No

Against the whole database

14,005 panels

Efficiency

#2,683 vs #1,424

LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W leads by 1,259 places

Power density

#2,731 vs #1,347

LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W leads by 1,384 places

Heat behaviour

#6,093 vs #6,093

Tied - the same position in the database

Weight

#8,477 vs #1,588

LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W leads by 6,889 places

Warranty

#21 vs #21

Tied - the same position in the database

Overall

#1,591 vs #75

LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W leads by 1,516 places

More useful comparisons

Open the full database

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W vs Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 585W

The same specification on paper

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W vs Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 580W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W vs Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 575W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W vs Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 570W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W

The same specification on paper

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-710W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Written summary

Checking cache...

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W or Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W?

According to our database: Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720 W has higher module efficiency (23.18% vs 22.83%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

What is the efficiency of Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W and Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W?

Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590 W has a module efficiency of 22.83%, while Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720 W is 23.18%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

What cell technology does Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W use vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W?

Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590 W uses TOPCon cells; Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

What is the warranty on Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W and Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W?

Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590 W has a 30 years power warranty; Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Are Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W and Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W bifacial panels?

Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590 W is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 5 Leapton offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.