495W vs 465W 11 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Leapton LP182182-M-60-NH-495W vs Leapton LP182182-M-60-NH-465W

Q: Which panel is better: Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-495W or Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-465W?

According to our database: Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-495W has higher module efficiency (22.33% vs 21.48%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

Q: What is the efficiency of Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-495W and Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-465W?

Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-495W has a module efficiency of 22.33%, while Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-465W is 21.48%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

Q: What cell technology does Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-495W use vs Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-465W?

Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-495W uses N-type cells; Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-465W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

Q: What is the warranty on Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-495W and Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-465W?

Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-495W has a 30 years power warranty; Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-465W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Leapton

LP182*182-M-60-NH-495W

495 Wp 22.33 % N-type

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

Leapton

LP182*182-M-60-NH-465W

465 Wp 21.48 % TOPCon

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

The verdict

495W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.85 pp more efficient. 11 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 8 differences

How alike are they

11 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical

identical differs

What actually differs

8 of 19 parameters

Parameter 495W 465W Difference

Module efficiency 22.33 % 21.48 % 0.85 pp more efficient

Rated power 495 Wp 465 Wp 30 W more power

Power density 223.3 Wp/m² 214.8 Wp/m² 8.5 Wp/m² higher

Module area 2.217 m² 2.165 m² 0.052 m² apart

Cell technology N-type TOPCon N-type vs TOPCon

Open-circuit voltage 43.82 V 42.45 V 1.37 V apart

Dimensions 1955x1134x30 mm 1909x1134x30 mm 1955x1134x30 mm vs 1909x1134x30 mm

Voltage at max power 36.35 V 34.89 V 1.46 V apart

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Cell temperature

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

495W

16,608 kWh

465W

15,602 kWh

Lifetime gap

1,006 kWh

Output when it is hot

Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees

Scenario 495W 465W

Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 495 W 465 W

Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 473 W 444 W

Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 450 W 423 W

Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 428 W 402 W

Full specification

Parameter 495W 465W Difference

Power and efficiency

Rated power 495 Wp 465 Wp +30 W for 495W

Module efficiency 22.33 % 21.48 % +0.85 pp for 495W

Power density 223.3 Wp/m² 214.8 Wp/m² +8.5 Wp/m² for 495W

Open-circuit voltage 43.82 V 42.45 V 1.37 V apart

Voltage at max power 36.35 V 34.89 V 1.46 V apart

Short-circuit current 14.09 A 13.90 A Effectively the same

Current at max power 13.62 A 13.33 A Effectively the same

Temperature

Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same

Mechanical

Dimensions 1955x1134x30 mm 1909x1134x30 mm 1955x1134x30 mm vs 1909x1134x30 mm

Module area 2.217 m² 2.165 m² 0.052 m² apart

Weight 23.5 kg 23.0 kg Effectively the same

Weight per kWp 47.5 kg/kWp 49.5 kg/kWp Effectively the same

Warranty and degradation

Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same

Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same

Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same

Technology

Cell technology N-type TOPCon N-type vs TOPCon

Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same

Cell count 120 120 Same

Bifacial No No Same

Against the whole database

14,005 panels

Efficiency

#5,054 vs #8,152

495W leads by 3,098 places

Power density

#5,043 vs #8,116

495W leads by 3,073 places

Heat behaviour

#6,093 vs #6,093

Tied - the same position in the database

Weight

#1,708 vs #2,991

495W leads by 1,283 places

Warranty

#21 vs #21

Tied - the same position in the database

Overall

#4,798 vs #6,851

495W leads by 2,053 places

More useful comparisons

Open the full database

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-495W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-500W

One difference: module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-495W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-490W

One difference: module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-495W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-485W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-495W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-480W

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-495W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-475W

8 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-495W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-470W

8 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Written summary

Checking cache...

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-495W or Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-465W?

According to our database: Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-495 W has higher module efficiency (22.33% vs 21.48%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

What is the efficiency of Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-495W and Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-465W?

Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-495 W has a module efficiency of 22.33%, while Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-465 W is 21.48%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

What cell technology does Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-495W use vs Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-465W?

Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-495 W uses N-type cells; Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-465 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

What is the warranty on Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-495W and Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-465W?

Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-495 W has a 30 years power warranty; Leapton LP182*182-M-60-NH-465 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 8 Leapton offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.