Skip to main content
440Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) vs 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) 18 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

KIOTO Solar KPV 440Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) vs KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)

KIOTO Solar
KPV 440Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)
440 Wp 22.53 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
KIOTO Solar
KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)
445 Wp 22.79 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.26 pp more efficient. 18 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See the one difference
How alike are they
18 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

1 of 19 parameters
Parameter 440Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) Difference
Module efficiency 22.53 % 22.79 % 0.26 pp more efficient
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
440Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)
13,757 kWh
445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)
13,913 kWh
Lifetime gap
156 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 440Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 440 W 445 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 420 W 425 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 400 W 405 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 381 W 385 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 440Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 440 Wp 445 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 22.53 % 22.79 % +0.26 pp for 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)
Power density 225.3 Wp/m² 227.9 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 39.30 V 39.45 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 33.09 V 33.24 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.99 A 14.10 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.30 A 13.39 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1722x1134x35 mm 1722x1134x35 mm Same
Module area 1.953 m² 1.953 m² Same
Weight 25.0 kg 25.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 56.8 kg/kWp 56.2 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.70 %/yr 0.70 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#3,982 vs #3,005
445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) leads by 977 places
Power density
#4,099 vs #2,790
445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) leads by 1,309 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#10,878 vs #10,457
445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) leads by 421 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#9,742 vs #9,379
445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) leads by 363 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
KIOTO Solar
KIOTO Solar KPV 440Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) vs KIOTO Solar KPV 450Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)
6 differences, the largest is open-circuit voltage
Same manufacturer
KIOTO Solar
KIOTO Solar KPV 440Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) vs KIOTO Solar KPV 450 Wp HC NE
9 differences, the largest is product warranty
Same manufacturer
KIOTO Solar
KIOTO Solar KPV 440Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) vs KIOTO Solar KPV 450Wp HC
11 differences, the largest is performance warranty
Same manufacturer
KIOTO Solar
KIOTO Solar KPV 440Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) vs KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC
11 differences, the largest is performance warranty
Same manufacturer
KIOTO Solar
KIOTO Solar KPV 440Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) vs KIOTO Solar KPV 440 Wp HCB
11 differences, the largest is performance warranty
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: KIOTO Solar KPV 440Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) or KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)?
According to our database: KIOTO Solar KPV 445 Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) has higher module efficiency (22.79% vs 22.53%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of KIOTO Solar KPV 440Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) and KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)?
KIOTO Solar KPV 440 Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) has a module efficiency of 22.53%, while KIOTO Solar KPV 445 Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) is 22.79%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does KIOTO Solar KPV 440Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) use vs KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)?
KIOTO Solar KPV 440 Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) uses TOPCon cells; KIOTO Solar KPV 445 Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on KIOTO Solar KPV 440Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) and KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)?
KIOTO Solar KPV 440 Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) has a 25 years power warranty; KIOTO Solar KPV 445 Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are KIOTO Solar KPV 440Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) and KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) bifacial panels?
Both KIOTO Solar KPV 440 Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) and KIOTO Solar KPV 445 Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 2 KIOTO Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.