Skip to main content
440 Wp HCB vs 450 Wp HC NE 3 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

KIOTO Solar KPV 440 Wp HCB vs KIOTO Solar KPV 450 Wp HC NE

KIOTO Solar
KPV 440 Wp HCB
440 Wp 22.02 % TOPCon
VS
KIOTO Solar
KPV 450 Wp HC NE
450 Wp 22.52 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

440 Wp HCB leads on the differences that matter

The largest is performance warranty: 5 yrs longer. 3 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 16 differences
How alike are they
3 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

16 of 19 parameters
Parameter 440 Wp HCB 450 Wp HC NE Difference
Performance warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs 5 yrs longer
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.70 %/yr 0.30 %/yr slower
Module efficiency 22.02 % 22.52 % 0.50 pp more efficient
Product warranty 30 yrs 12 yrs 18 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient -0.320 %/°C -0.300 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat
Weight 22.5 kg 25.5 kg 3.0 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 51.1 kg/kWp 56.7 kg/kWp 5.5 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 39.78 V 35.14 V 4.64 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.63 A 16.01 A 2.38 A apart
Power density 220.2 Wp/m² 225.2 Wp/m² 5.0 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 440 Wp 450 Wp 10 W more power
Voltage at max power 34.06 V 29.14 V 4.92 V apart
Current at max power 12.93 A 15.54 A 2.61 A apart
Cell count 108 96 12 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Dimensions 1748x1143x35 mm 1762x1134x35 mm 1748x1143x35 mm vs 1762x1134x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
440 Wp HCB
14,763 kWh
450 Wp HC NE
14,070 kWh
Lifetime gap
693 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 440 Wp HCB 450 Wp HC NE
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 440 W 450 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.2% of rated power 419 W 430 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 90.4% of rated power 398 W 410 W
Hot roof 70 °C 85.6% of rated power 377 W 389 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 440 Wp HCB 450 Wp HC NE Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 440 Wp 450 Wp +10 W for 450 Wp HC NE
Module efficiency 22.02 % 22.52 % +0.50 pp for 450 Wp HC NE
Power density 220.2 Wp/m² 225.2 Wp/m² +5.0 Wp/m² for 450 Wp HC NE
Open-circuit voltage 39.78 V 35.14 V 4.64 V apart
Voltage at max power 34.06 V 29.14 V 4.92 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.63 A 16.01 A 2.38 A apart
Current at max power 12.93 A 15.54 A 2.61 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.320 %/°C -0.300 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for 450 Wp HC NE
Mechanical
Dimensions 1748x1143x35 mm 1762x1134x35 mm 1748x1143x35 mm vs 1762x1134x35 mm
Module area 1.998 m² 1.998 m² Same
Weight 22.5 kg 25.5 kg -3.0 kg for 440 Wp HCB
Weight per kWp 51.1 kg/kWp 56.7 kg/kWp -5.5 kg/kWp for 440 Wp HCB
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 12 yrs +18 yrs for 440 Wp HCB
Performance warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs +5 yrs for 440 Wp HCB
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.70 %/yr -0.30 %/yr for 440 Wp HCB
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 96 12 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#6,329 vs #4,108
450 Wp HC NE leads by 2,221 places
Power density
#6,326 vs #4,225
450 Wp HC NE leads by 2,101 places
Heat behaviour
#8,312 vs #6,093
450 Wp HC NE leads by 2,219 places
Weight
#4,485 vs #10,792
440 Wp HCB leads by 6,307 places
Warranty
#21 vs #9,798
440 Wp HCB leads by 9,777 places
Overall
#5,966 vs #9,936
440 Wp HCB leads by 3,970 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
KIOTO Solar
KIOTO Solar KPV 440 Wp HCB vs KIOTO Solar KPV 450Wp HC
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
KIOTO Solar
KIOTO Solar KPV 440 Wp HCB vs KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
KIOTO Solar
KIOTO Solar KPV 450 Wp HC NE vs KIOTO Solar KPV 450Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)
5 differences, the largest is product warranty
Same series, other bin
KIOTO Solar
KIOTO Solar KPV 450 Wp HC NE vs KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)
9 differences, the largest is product warranty
Same series, other bin
KIOTO Solar
KIOTO Solar KPV 450 Wp HC NE vs KIOTO Solar KPV 440Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)
9 differences, the largest is product warranty
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: KIOTO Solar KPV 440 Wp HCB or KIOTO Solar KPV 450 Wp HC NE?
According to our database: KIOTO Solar KPV 450 Wp HC NE has higher module efficiency (22.52% vs 22.02%); KIOTO Solar KPV 450 Wp HC NE tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.320%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of KIOTO Solar KPV 440 Wp HCB and KIOTO Solar KPV 450 Wp HC NE?
KIOTO Solar KPV 440 Wp HCB has a module efficiency of 22.02%, while KIOTO Solar KPV 450 Wp HC NE is 22.52%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does KIOTO Solar KPV 440 Wp HCB use vs KIOTO Solar KPV 450 Wp HC NE?
KIOTO Solar KPV 440 Wp HCB uses TOPCon cells; KIOTO Solar KPV 450 Wp HC NE uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on KIOTO Solar KPV 440 Wp HCB and KIOTO Solar KPV 450 Wp HC NE?
KIOTO Solar KPV 440 Wp HCB has a 30 years power warranty; KIOTO Solar KPV 450 Wp HC NE has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are KIOTO Solar KPV 440 Wp HCB and KIOTO Solar KPV 450 Wp HC NE bifacial panels?
KIOTO Solar KPV 450 Wp HC NE is bifacial (captures light from both faces); KIOTO Solar KPV 440 Wp HCB is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 2 KIOTO Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.