Skip to main content
470 vs 445 14 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470 vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-445

Jolywood
JW-HD96N-R2-470
470 Wp 23.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Jolywood
JW-HD96N-R2-445
445 Wp 22.30 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

470 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.20 pp more efficient. 14 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 5 differences
How alike are they
14 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

5 of 19 parameters
Parameter 470 445 Difference
Module efficiency 23.50 % 22.30 % 1.20 pp more efficient
Power density 235.2 Wp/m² 222.7 Wp/m² 12.5 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 470 Wp 445 Wp 25 W more power
Weight per kWp 52.3 kg/kWp 55.3 kg/kWp 2.9 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 35.71 V 34.71 V 1.00 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
470
15,769 kWh
445
14,931 kWh
Lifetime gap
838 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 470 445
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 470 W 445 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 450 W 426 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 431 W 408 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 411 W 389 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 470 445 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 470 Wp 445 Wp +25 W for 470
Module efficiency 23.50 % 22.30 % +1.20 pp for 470
Power density 235.2 Wp/m² 222.7 Wp/m² +12.5 Wp/m² for 470
Open-circuit voltage 35.71 V 34.71 V 1.00 V apart
Voltage at max power 30.70 V 29.80 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 16.14 A 15.79 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 15.31 A 14.93 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.998 m² 1.998 m² Same
Weight 24.6 kg 24.6 kg Same
Weight per kWp 52.3 kg/kWp 55.3 kg/kWp -2.9 kg/kWp for 470
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 96 96 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#716 vs #5,100
470 leads by 4,384 places
Power density
#674 vs #5,302
470 leads by 4,628 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #1,309
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,827 vs #9,718
470 leads by 3,891 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,371 vs #6,677
470 leads by 2,306 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470 vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470 vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-460
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470 vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470 vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-450
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W
12 differences, the largest is rated power
Same manufacturer
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715
12 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470 or Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-445?
According to our database: Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470 has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 22.30%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470 and Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-445?
Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470 has a module efficiency of 23.50%, while Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-445 is 22.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470 use vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-445?
Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470 uses TOPCon cells; Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-445 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470 and Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-445?
Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470 has a 30 years power warranty; Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-445 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470 and Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-445 bifacial panels?
Both Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470 and Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-445 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 42 Jolywood offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.