Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W
VS
The verdict
11 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is rated power: 260 W more power. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 11 differencesHow alike are they
8
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
11 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
HD96N-R2-455
HD132N-715W
Difference
Rated power
455 Wp
715 Wp
260 W more power
Weight
24.6 kg
38.1 kg
13.5 kg lighter
Product warranty
25 yrs
12 yrs
13 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
35.11 V
48.14 V
13.03 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.93 A
18.28 A
2.35 A apart
Module area
1.998 m²
3.106 m²
1.108 m² apart
Module efficiency
22.80 %
23.00 %
0.20 pp more efficient
Voltage at max power
30.16 V
41.32 V
11.16 V apart
Current at max power
15.09 A
17.30 A
2.21 A apart
Cell count
96
132
36 cells apart
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
HD96N-R2-455
15,266 kWh
HD132N-715W
23,990 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,724 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
HD96N-R2-455
HD132N-715W
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
455 W
715 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.8% of rated power
436 W
685 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.6% of rated power
417 W
655 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.4% of rated power
398 W
625 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
HD96N-R2-455
HD132N-715W
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
455 Wp
715 Wp
+260 W for HD132N-715W
Module efficiency
22.80 %
23.00 %
+0.20 pp for HD132N-715W
Power density
227.7 Wp/m²
230.2 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
35.11 V
48.14 V
13.03 V apart
Voltage at max power
30.16 V
41.32 V
11.16 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.93 A
18.28 A
2.35 A apart
Current at max power
15.09 A
17.30 A
2.21 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
1.998 m²
3.106 m²
1.108 m² apart
Weight
24.6 kg
38.1 kg
-13.5 kg for HD96N-R2-455
Weight per kWp
54.1 kg/kWp
53.3 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
12 yrs
+13 yrs for HD96N-R2-455
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
96
132
36 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#2,714
vs
#1,919
HD132N-715W leads by 795 places
Power density
#2,888
vs
#2,018
HD132N-715W leads by 870 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309
vs
#1,309
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,287
vs
#7,172
HD132N-715W leads by 1,115 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,669
vs
#678
HD132N-715W leads by 4,991 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455 vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-470
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455 vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-465
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455 vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-460
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455 vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-450
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455 vs Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-445
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455 or Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W?
According to our database: Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 W has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 22.80%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W?
Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455 has a module efficiency of 22.80%, while Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 W is 23.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455 use vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W?
Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455 uses TOPCon cells; Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W?
Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455 has a 30 years power warranty; Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W bifacial panels?
Both Jolywood JW-HD96N-R2-455 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 45 Jolywood offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.