Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-525
VS
The verdict
HD108N-R2-525 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 190 W more power. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 12 differencesHow alike are they
7
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
12 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
HD132N-715
HD108N-R2-525
Difference
Rated power
715 Wp
525 Wp
190 W more power
Module efficiency
23.00 %
23.60 %
0.60 pp more efficient
Weight
38.1 kg
27.3 kg
10.8 kg lighter
Product warranty
12 yrs
25 yrs
13 yrs longer
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
236.2 Wp/m²
6.0 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage
48.14 V
40.03 V
8.11 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.28 A
16.08 A
2.20 A apart
Module area
3.106 m²
2.223 m²
0.884 m² apart
Voltage at max power
41.32 V
34.40 V
6.92 V apart
Current at max power
17.30 A
15.26 A
2.04 A apart
Cell count
132
108
24 cells apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1960x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1960x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
HD132N-715
23,990 kWh
HD108N-R2-525
17,615 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,375 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
HD132N-715
HD108N-R2-525
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
715 W
525 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.8% of rated power
685 W
503 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.6% of rated power
655 W
481 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.4% of rated power
625 W
459 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
HD132N-715
HD108N-R2-525
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
715 Wp
525 Wp
+190 W for HD132N-715
Module efficiency
23.00 %
23.60 %
+0.60 pp for HD108N-R2-525
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
236.2 Wp/m²
+6.0 Wp/m² for HD108N-R2-525
Open-circuit voltage
48.14 V
40.03 V
8.11 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.32 V
34.40 V
6.92 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.28 A
16.08 A
2.20 A apart
Current at max power
17.30 A
15.26 A
2.04 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1960x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1960x1134x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
2.223 m²
0.884 m² apart
Weight
38.1 kg
27.3 kg
-10.8 kg for HD108N-R2-525
Weight per kWp
53.3 kg/kWp
52.0 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
25 yrs
+13 yrs for HD108N-R2-525
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
108
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,919
vs
#627
HD108N-R2-525 leads by 1,292 places
Power density
#2,018
vs
#614
HD108N-R2-525 leads by 1,404 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309
vs
#1,309
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,172
vs
#5,417
HD108N-R2-525 leads by 1,755 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#678
vs
#2,443
HD132N-715 leads by 1,765 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-710W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-710
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-705W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-705
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-700
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 or Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-525?
According to our database: Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-525 has higher module efficiency (23.60% vs 23.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 and Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-525?
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-525 is 23.60%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 use vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-525?
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 uses TOPCon cells; Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-525 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 and Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-525?
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 has a 30 years power warranty; Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-525 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 and Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-525 bifacial panels?
Both Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 and Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-525 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 42 Jolywood offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.