Skip to main content
HD108N-R2-510 vs HD132N-715 9 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-510 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715

Jolywood
JW-HD108N-R2-510
510 Wp 22.90 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715
Jolywood
JW-HD132N-715
715 Wp 23.00 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

HD108N-R2-510 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 205 W more power. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 10 differences
How alike are they
9 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

10 of 19 parameters
Parameter HD108N-R2-510 HD132N-715 Difference
Rated power 510 Wp 715 Wp 205 W more power
Weight 27.3 kg 38.1 kg 10.8 kg lighter
Product warranty 25 yrs 12 yrs 13 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage 39.43 V 48.14 V 8.71 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.90 A 18.28 A 2.38 A apart
Module area 2.223 m² 3.106 m² 0.884 m² apart
Voltage at max power 33.86 V 41.32 V 7.46 V apart
Current at max power 15.06 A 17.30 A 2.24 A apart
Cell count 108 132 24 cells apart
Dimensions 1960x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 1960x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
HD108N-R2-510
17,112 kWh
HD132N-715
23,990 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,878 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario HD108N-R2-510 HD132N-715
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 510 W 715 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 489 W 685 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 467 W 655 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 446 W 625 W
03

Full specification

Parameter HD108N-R2-510 HD132N-715 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 510 Wp 715 Wp +205 W for HD132N-715
Module efficiency 22.90 % 23.00 % Effectively the same
Power density 229.5 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 39.43 V 48.14 V 8.71 V apart
Voltage at max power 33.86 V 41.32 V 7.46 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.90 A 18.28 A 2.38 A apart
Current at max power 15.06 A 17.30 A 2.24 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1960x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 1960x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 2.223 m² 3.106 m² 0.884 m² apart
Weight 27.3 kg 38.1 kg -10.8 kg for HD108N-R2-510
Weight per kWp 53.5 kg/kWp 53.3 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 12 yrs +13 yrs for HD108N-R2-510
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 132 24 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#2,359 vs #1,919
HD132N-715 leads by 440 places
Power density
#2,316 vs #2,018
HD132N-715 leads by 298 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #1,309
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,509 vs #7,172
HD132N-715 leads by 337 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,715 vs #678
HD132N-715 leads by 3,037 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-510 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-525
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-510 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-520
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-510 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-515
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-510 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-505
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-510 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-510 or Jolywood JW-HD132N-715?
According to our database: Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 22.90%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-510 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-715?
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-510 has a module efficiency of 22.90%, while Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 is 23.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-510 use vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715?
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-510 uses TOPCon cells; Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-510 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-715?
Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-510 has a 30 years power warranty; Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-510 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 bifacial panels?
Both Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-510 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 42 Jolywood offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.