HD108N-R2-500 vs HD132N-715W 7 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W

Q: Which panel is better: Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 or Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W?

According to our database: Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 22.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

Q: What is the efficiency of Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W?

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 has a module efficiency of 22.50%, while Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W is 23.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

Q: What cell technology does Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 use vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W?

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 uses TOPCon cells; Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

Q: What is the warranty on Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W?

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 has a 30 years power warranty; Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Q: Are Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W bifacial panels?

Both Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Jolywood

JW-HD108N-R2-500

500 Wp 22.50 % TOPCon Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

Jolywood

JW-HD132N-715W

715 Wp 23.00 % TOPCon Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

The verdict

12 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is rated power: 215 W more power. 7 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 12 differences

How alike are they

7 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical

identical differs

What actually differs

12 of 19 parameters

Parameter HD108N-R2-500 HD132N-715W Difference

Rated power 500 Wp 715 Wp 215 W more power

Module efficiency 22.50 % 23.00 % 0.50 pp more efficient

Weight 27.3 kg 38.1 kg 10.8 kg lighter

Product warranty 25 yrs 12 yrs 13 yrs longer

Open-circuit voltage 39.03 V 48.14 V 9.11 V apart

Short-circuit current 15.78 A 18.28 A 2.50 A apart

Module area 2.223 m² 3.106 m² 0.884 m² apart

Power density 225.0 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² 5.2 Wp/m² higher

Voltage at max power 33.50 V 41.32 V 7.82 V apart

Current at max power 14.92 A 17.30 A 2.38 A apart

Cell count 108 132 24 cells apart

Dimensions 1960x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 1960x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Cell temperature

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

HD108N-R2-500

16,776 kWh

HD132N-715W

23,990 kWh

Lifetime gap

7,214 kWh

Output when it is hot

Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees

Scenario HD108N-R2-500 HD132N-715W

Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 500 W 715 W

Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 479 W 685 W

Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 458 W 655 W

Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 437 W 625 W

Full specification

Parameter HD108N-R2-500 HD132N-715W Difference

Power and efficiency

Rated power 500 Wp 715 Wp +215 W for HD132N-715W

Module efficiency 22.50 % 23.00 % +0.50 pp for HD132N-715W

Power density 225.0 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² +5.2 Wp/m² for HD132N-715W

Open-circuit voltage 39.03 V 48.14 V 9.11 V apart

Voltage at max power 33.50 V 41.32 V 7.82 V apart

Short-circuit current 15.78 A 18.28 A 2.50 A apart

Current at max power 14.92 A 17.30 A 2.38 A apart

Temperature

Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same

Mechanical

Dimensions 1960x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 1960x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm

Module area 2.223 m² 3.106 m² 0.884 m² apart

Weight 27.3 kg 38.1 kg -10.8 kg for HD108N-R2-500

Weight per kWp 54.6 kg/kWp 53.3 kg/kWp Effectively the same

Warranty and degradation

Product warranty 25 yrs 12 yrs +13 yrs for HD108N-R2-500

Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same

Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same

Technology

Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same

Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same

Cell count 108 132 24 cells apart

Bifacial Yes Yes Same

Against the whole database

14,005 panels

Efficiency

#4,222 vs #1,919

HD132N-715W leads by 2,303 places

Power density

#4,450 vs #2,018

HD132N-715W leads by 2,432 places

Heat behaviour

#1,309 vs #1,309

Tied - the same position in the database

Weight

#8,949 vs #7,172

HD132N-715W leads by 1,777 places

Warranty

#21 vs #21

Tied - the same position in the database

Overall

#4,561 vs #678

HD132N-715W leads by 3,883 places

More useful comparisons

Open the full database

Same series, other bin

Jolywood

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-525

5 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Jolywood

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-520

4 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Jolywood

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-515

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Jolywood

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-510

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Jolywood

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-505

One difference: module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Jolywood

Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715

The same specification on paper

Written summary

Checking cache...

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 or Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W?

According to our database: Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 W has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 22.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

What is the efficiency of Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W?

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 has a module efficiency of 22.50%, while Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 W is 23.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

What cell technology does Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 use vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W?

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 uses TOPCon cells; Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

What is the warranty on Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W?

Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 has a 30 years power warranty; Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Are Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W bifacial panels?

Both Jolywood JW-HD108N-R2-500 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 45 Jolywood offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.