Jolywood JW-HD108N-425 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715
VS
The verdict
HD132N-715 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.24 pp more efficient. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
14 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
HD108N-425
HD132N-715
Difference
Module efficiency
21.76 %
23.00 %
1.24 pp more efficient
Rated power
425 Wp
715 Wp
290 W more power
Power density
217.6 Wp/m²
230.2 Wp/m²
12.5 Wp/m² higher
Weight
24.5 kg
38.1 kg
13.6 kg lighter
Product warranty
25 yrs
12 yrs
13 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
Open-circuit voltage
38.10 V
48.14 V
10.04 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.05 A
18.28 A
4.23 A apart
Module area
1.953 m²
3.106 m²
1.154 m² apart
Weight per kWp
57.6 kg/kWp
53.3 kg/kWp
4.4 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power
32.10 V
41.32 V
9.22 V apart
Current at max power
13.24 A
17.30 A
4.06 A apart
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Dimensions
1722x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1722x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
HD108N-425
14,260 kWh
HD132N-715
23,990 kWh
Lifetime gap
9,730 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
HD108N-425
HD132N-715
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
425 W
715 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
406 W
685 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
387 W
655 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
368 W
625 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
HD108N-425
HD132N-715
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
425 Wp
715 Wp
+290 W for HD132N-715
Module efficiency
21.76 %
23.00 %
+1.24 pp for HD132N-715
Power density
217.6 Wp/m²
230.2 Wp/m²
+12.5 Wp/m² for HD132N-715
Open-circuit voltage
38.10 V
48.14 V
10.04 V apart
Voltage at max power
32.10 V
41.32 V
9.22 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.05 A
18.28 A
4.23 A apart
Current at max power
13.24 A
17.30 A
4.06 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for HD132N-715
Mechanical
Dimensions
1722x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1722x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
1.953 m²
3.106 m²
1.154 m² apart
Weight
24.5 kg
38.1 kg
-13.6 kg for HD108N-425
Weight per kWp
57.6 kg/kWp
53.3 kg/kWp
-4.4 kg/kWp for HD132N-715
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
12 yrs
+13 yrs for HD108N-425
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#7,349
vs
#1,970
HD132N-715 leads by 5,379 places
Power density
#7,235
vs
#2,070
HD132N-715 leads by 5,165 places
Heat behaviour
#6,152
vs
#1,347
HD132N-715 leads by 4,805 places
Weight
#11,411
vs
#7,237
HD132N-715 leads by 4,174 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,241
vs
#691
HD132N-715 leads by 7,550 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-425 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-440
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-425 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-435
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-425 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-430
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-425 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-420
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-425 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-415
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jolywood JW-HD108N-425 or Jolywood JW-HD132N-715?
According to our database: Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 21.76%); Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jolywood JW-HD108N-425 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-715?
Jolywood JW-HD108N-425 has a module efficiency of 21.76%, while Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 is 23.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jolywood JW-HD108N-425 use vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715?
Jolywood JW-HD108N-425 uses TOPCon cells; Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jolywood JW-HD108N-425 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-715?
Jolywood JW-HD108N-425 has a 30 years power warranty; Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jolywood JW-HD108N-425 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 bifacial panels?
Both Jolywood JW-HD108N-425 and Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 24 Jolywood offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.