Skip to main content
420 vs 440 15 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-440

Jolywood JW-HD108N-420
Jolywood
JW-HD108N-420
420 Wp 21.51 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Jolywood JW-HD108N-440
Jolywood
JW-HD108N-440
440 Wp 22.53 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

440 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.02 pp more efficient. 15 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 4 differences
How alike are they
15 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

4 of 19 parameters
Parameter 420 440 Difference
Module efficiency 21.51 % 22.53 % 1.02 pp more efficient
Power density 215.1 Wp/m² 225.3 Wp/m² 10.2 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 420 Wp 440 Wp 20 W more power
Weight per kWp 58.3 kg/kWp 55.7 kg/kWp 2.7 kg/kWp lighter
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
420
14,092 kWh
440
14,763 kWh
Lifetime gap
671 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 420 440
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 420 W 440 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 401 W 420 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 382 W 400 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 363 W 381 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 420 440 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 420 Wp 440 Wp +20 W for 440
Module efficiency 21.51 % 22.53 % +1.02 pp for 440
Power density 215.1 Wp/m² 225.3 Wp/m² +10.2 Wp/m² for 440
Open-circuit voltage 37.90 V 38.60 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 31.90 V 32.70 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.98 A 14.25 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.17 A 13.46 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1722x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.953 m² 1.953 m² Same
Weight 24.5 kg 24.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 58.3 kg/kWp 55.7 kg/kWp -2.7 kg/kWp for 440
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#7,958 vs #4,041
440 leads by 3,917 places
Power density
#7,946 vs #4,158
440 leads by 3,788 places
Heat behaviour
#6,152 vs #6,152
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#11,757 vs #10,132
440 leads by 1,625 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,714 vs #6,647
440 leads by 2,067 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-435
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-430
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-425
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-415
One difference: module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 or Jolywood JW-HD108N-440?
According to our database: Jolywood JW-HD108N-440 has higher module efficiency (22.53% vs 21.51%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 and Jolywood JW-HD108N-440?
Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 has a module efficiency of 21.51%, while Jolywood JW-HD108N-440 is 22.53%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 use vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-440?
Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 uses TOPCon cells; Jolywood JW-HD108N-440 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 and Jolywood JW-HD108N-440?
Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 has a 30 years power warranty; Jolywood JW-HD108N-440 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 and Jolywood JW-HD108N-440 bifacial panels?
Both Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 and Jolywood JW-HD108N-440 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 24 Jolywood offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.