Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-435
VS
The verdict
435 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.76 pp more efficient. 15 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 4 differencesHow alike are they
15
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
4 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
420
435
Difference
Module efficiency
21.51 %
22.27 %
0.76 pp more efficient
Power density
215.1 Wp/m²
222.8 Wp/m²
7.7 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
420 Wp
435 Wp
15 W more power
Weight per kWp
58.3 kg/kWp
56.3 kg/kWp
2.0 kg/kWp lighter
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
420
14,092 kWh
435
14,595 kWh
Lifetime gap
503 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
420
435
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
420 W
435 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
401 W
415 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
382 W
396 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
363 W
376 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
420
435
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
420 Wp
435 Wp
+15 W for 435
Module efficiency
21.51 %
22.27 %
+0.76 pp for 435
Power density
215.1 Wp/m²
222.8 Wp/m²
+7.7 Wp/m² for 435
Open-circuit voltage
37.90 V
38.40 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
31.90 V
32.50 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
13.98 A
14.18 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
13.17 A
13.39 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1722x1134x30 mm
1722x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
1.953 m²
1.953 m²
Same
Weight
24.5 kg
24.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
58.3 kg/kWp
56.3 kg/kWp
-2.0 kg/kWp for 435
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
25 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
108
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#7,958
vs
#5,544
435 leads by 2,414 places
Power density
#7,946
vs
#5,212
435 leads by 2,734 places
Heat behaviour
#6,152
vs
#6,152
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#11,757
vs
#10,653
435 leads by 1,104 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,714
vs
#7,183
435 leads by 1,531 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-440
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-430
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-425
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-415
One difference: module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 or Jolywood JW-HD108N-435?
According to our database: Jolywood JW-HD108N-435 has higher module efficiency (22.27% vs 21.51%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 and Jolywood JW-HD108N-435?
Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 has a module efficiency of 21.51%, while Jolywood JW-HD108N-435 is 22.27%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 use vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-435?
Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 uses TOPCon cells; Jolywood JW-HD108N-435 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 and Jolywood JW-HD108N-435?
Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 has a 30 years power warranty; Jolywood JW-HD108N-435 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 and Jolywood JW-HD108N-435 bifacial panels?
Both Jolywood JW-HD108N-420 and Jolywood JW-HD108N-435 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 24 Jolywood offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.