Skip to main content
JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin) vs JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU 19 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin) vs Jinko Solar JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU

Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)
JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)
730 Wp 23.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Jinko Solar JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU
JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU
730 Wp 23.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

Identical on every published parameter

All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.

How alike are they
19 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

0 of 19 parameters

Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.

02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)
24,493 kWh
JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU
24,493 kWh
Lifetime gap
No difference
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin) JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 730 W 730 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 698 W 698 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 666 W 666 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 635 W 635 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin) JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 730 Wp 730 Wp Same
Module efficiency 23.50 % 23.50 % Same
Power density 235.0 Wp/m² 235.0 Wp/m² Same
Open-circuit voltage 49.36 V 49.36 V Same
Voltage at max power 41.11 V 41.11 V Same
Short-circuit current 18.81 A 18.81 A Same
Current at max power 17.76 A 17.76 A Same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x33 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 37.5 kg 37.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 51.4 kg/kWp 51.4 kg/kWp Same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#716 vs #716
Tied - the same position in the database
Power density
#800 vs #800
Tied - the same position in the database
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,748 vs #4,748
Tied - the same position in the database
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#302 vs #302
Tied - the same position in the database
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin) vs Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin) vs Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin) vs Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin) vs Jinko Solar JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin) vs Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin) vs Jinko Solar JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin) or Jinko Solar JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU?
According to our database: both panels are closely matched on key specs - the decision often comes down to price and local availability. See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin) and Jinko Solar JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU?
Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730 W bin) has a module efficiency of 23.50%, while Jinko Solar JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin) use vs Jinko Solar JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU?
Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730 W bin) uses TOPCon cells; Jinko Solar JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin) and Jinko Solar JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU?
Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730 W bin) has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin) and Jinko Solar JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU bifacial panels?
Both Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730 W bin) and Jinko Solar JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 175 Jinko Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.