Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (615W variant) vs Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635W variant)
VS
The verdict
(635W variant) leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.72 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 3 differencesHow alike are they
16
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
3 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
(615W variant)
(635W variant)
Difference
Module efficiency
22.00 %
22.72 %
0.72 pp more efficient
Power density
220.0 Wp/m²
227.2 Wp/m²
7.2 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
615 Wp
635 Wp
20 W more power
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
(615W variant)
20,634 kWh
(635W variant)
21,306 kWh
Lifetime gap
672 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
(615W variant)
(635W variant)
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
615 W
635 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
588 W
607 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
561 W
580 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
535 W
552 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
(615W variant)
(635W variant)
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
615 Wp
635 Wp
+20 W for (635W variant)
Module efficiency
22.00 %
22.72 %
+0.72 pp for (635W variant)
Power density
220.0 Wp/m²
227.2 Wp/m²
+7.2 Wp/m² for (635W variant)
Open-circuit voltage
56.25 V
56.85 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
46.81 V
47.46 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
13.80 A
14.04 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
13.14 A
13.38 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2465x1134x35 mm
2465x1134x35 mm
Same
Module area
2.795 m²
2.795 m²
Same
Weight
29.5 kg
29.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
48.0 kg/kWp
46.5 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
N-type
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
156
156
Same
Bifacial
No
No
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#6,517
vs
#3,245
(635W variant) leads by 3,272 places
Power density
#6,655
vs
#3,252
(635W variant) leads by 3,403 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,001
vs
#1,173
(635W variant) leads by 828 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,759
vs
#2,249
(635W variant) leads by 1,510 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (615W variant) vs Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (630W variant)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (615W variant) vs Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (625W variant)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (615W variant) vs Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (620W variant)
The same specification on paper
Same manufacturer
Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (615W variant) vs Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (615W variant) vs Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (615W variant) vs Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (615W variant) or Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635W variant)?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635 W variant) has higher module efficiency (22.72% vs 22.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (615W variant) and Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635W variant)?
Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (615 W variant) has a module efficiency of 22.00%, while Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635 W variant) is 22.72%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (615W variant) use vs Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635W variant)?
Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (615 W variant) uses N-type cells; Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635 W variant) uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (615W variant) and Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635W variant)?
Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (615 W variant) has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635 W variant) has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Shop prices: See 176 Jinko Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.