Skip to main content
(V) 605W vs (V)-F8 (600W bin) 19 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Jinko Solar JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V) 605W vs Jinko Solar JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V)-F8 (600W bin)

Jinko Solar JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V) 605W
JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V) 605W
605 Wp 23.42 % N-type
VS
Jinko Solar JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V)-F8 (600W bin)
JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V)-F8 (600W bin)
600 Wp 23.23 % N-type
The verdict

Identical on every published parameter

All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.

How alike are they
19 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

0 of 19 parameters

Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.

02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
(V) 605W
20,299 kWh
(V)-F8 (600W bin)
20,131 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario (V) 605W (V)-F8 (600W bin)
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 605 W 600 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 579 W 574 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 552 W 548 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 526 W 522 W
03

Full specification

Parameter (V) 605W (V)-F8 (600W bin) Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 605 Wp 600 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 23.42 % 23.23 % Effectively the same
Power density 234.2 Wp/m² 232.3 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 53.11 V 52.95 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 44.23 V 44.06 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.31 A 14.25 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.68 A 13.62 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same
Weight 27.0 kg 27.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 44.6 kg/kWp 45.0 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type N-type Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#902 vs #1,295
(V) 605W leads by 393 places
Power density
#900 vs #1,295
(V) 605W leads by 395 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#490 vs #574
(V) 605W leads by 84 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,476 vs #2,837
(V) 605W leads by 361 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V) 605W vs Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635W variant)
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V) 605W vs Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (630W variant)
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V) 605W vs Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (625W variant)
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V) 605W vs Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (620W variant)
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V) 605W vs Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (615W variant)
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V) 605W vs Jinko Solar JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V)-F8 (605W bin)
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V) 605W or Jinko Solar JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V)-F8 (600W bin)?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V) 605 W has higher module efficiency (23.42% vs 23.23%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V) 605W and Jinko Solar JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V)-F8 (600W bin)?
Jinko Solar JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V) 605 W has a module efficiency of 23.42%, while Jinko Solar JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V)-F8 (600 W bin) is 23.23%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V) 605W use vs Jinko Solar JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V)-F8 (600W bin)?
Jinko Solar JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V) 605 W uses N-type cells; Jinko Solar JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V)-F8 (600 W bin) uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V) 605W and Jinko Solar JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V)-F8 (600W bin)?
Jinko Solar JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V) 605 W has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM580-605N-72HL4-(V)-F8 (600 W bin) has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 135 Jinko Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.