Skip to main content
JKM525-54HL4M-BDV vs JKM425N-54HL4R-B 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Jinko Solar JKM525-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B

Jinko Solar JKM525-54HL4M-BDV
JKM525-54HL4M-BDV
525 Wp 23.61 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
JKM425N-54HL4R-B
425 Wp 21.27 % N-type
The verdict

JKM525-54HL4M-BDV leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 2.34 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter JKM525-54HL4M-BDV JKM425N-54HL4R-B Difference
Module efficiency 23.61 % 21.27 % 2.34 pp more efficient
Rated power 525 Wp 425 Wp 100 W more power
Power density 236.1 Wp/m² 212.7 Wp/m² 23.4 Wp/m² higher
Weight 27.0 kg 22.0 kg 5.0 kg lighter
Product warranty 15 yrs 25 yrs 10 yrs longer
Short-circuit current 15.88 A 13.58 A 2.30 A apart
Module area 2.224 m² 1.998 m² 0.226 m² apart
Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type
Open-circuit voltage 41.23 V 38.95 V 2.28 V apart
Current at max power 14.98 A 13.13 A 1.85 A apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Voltage at max power 35.05 V 32.37 V 2.68 V apart
Dimensions 1961x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 1961x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JKM525-54HL4M-BDV
17,615 kWh
JKM425N-54HL4R-B
14,260 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,355 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JKM525-54HL4M-BDV JKM425N-54HL4R-B
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 525 W 425 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 502 W 407 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 479 W 388 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 456 W 370 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JKM525-54HL4M-BDV JKM425N-54HL4R-B Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 525 Wp 425 Wp +100 W for JKM525-54HL4M-BDV
Module efficiency 23.61 % 21.27 % +2.34 pp for JKM525-54HL4M-BDV
Power density 236.1 Wp/m² 212.7 Wp/m² +23.4 Wp/m² for JKM525-54HL4M-BDV
Open-circuit voltage 41.23 V 38.95 V 2.28 V apart
Voltage at max power 35.05 V 32.37 V 2.68 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.88 A 13.58 A 2.30 A apart
Current at max power 14.98 A 13.13 A 1.85 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1961x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 1961x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.224 m² 1.998 m² 0.226 m² apart
Weight 27.0 kg 22.0 kg -5.0 kg for JKM425N-54HL4R-B
Weight per kWp 51.4 kg/kWp 51.8 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 25 yrs +10 yrs for JKM425N-54HL4R-B
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#653 vs #8,918
JKM525-54HL4M-BDV leads by 8,265 places
Power density
#678 vs #8,800
JKM525-54HL4M-BDV leads by 8,122 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,830 vs #5,163
JKM525-54HL4M-BDV leads by 333 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,483 vs #8,718
JKM525-54HL4M-BDV leads by 4,235 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM525-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM520-54HL4M-BDV
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM525-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM515-54HL4M-BDV
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM525-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM510-54HL4M-BDV
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM525-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM505-54HL4M-BDV
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM525-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM525-54HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM525-54HL4M-BDV or Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM525-54HL4M-BDV has higher module efficiency (23.61% vs 21.27%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM525-54HL4M-BDV and Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B?
Jinko Solar JKM525-54HL4M-BDV has a module efficiency of 23.61%, while Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B is 21.27%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM525-54HL4M-BDV use vs Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B?
Jinko Solar JKM525-54HL4M-BDV uses TOPCon cells; Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM525-54HL4M-BDV and Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B?
Jinko Solar JKM525-54HL4M-BDV has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jinko Solar JKM525-54HL4M-BDV and Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B bifacial panels?
Jinko Solar JKM525-54HL4M-BDV is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Jinko Solar JKM425N-54HL4R-B is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 132 Jinko Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.